site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
186
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA

2 edits

Only 23% of all households? ONLY?!?

Considering AT&T doesn't service ALL households with any service, that 23% share will be a big chunk of those households they do currently service.

Even if AT&T services is available to half of all households...them having 1/2 of that would be damn good.
--
Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire


johndoe303

join:2003-01-01
Boca Raton, FL

No surprises there.. Now if only Verizon would come to town.
--
WRTSL54GS v2 + WRT54G v2



ColorBASIC
8-bit Fun
Premium
join:2006-12-29
Corona, CA

1 edit

They deployed in my area but the prices aren't that impressive. Between HSI and FiOSTV Verizon has already taken a number of increases while Time Warner ramped up speeds to match VZ.
--
Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire



china crisis

join:2003-05-28

FTTT

I heard AT&T is working with Google with thier FTTT (fiber through the toilet) It's a catch basin for all the antiqudated hardware people will be returning in 2 years. Flush and close the lid on AT&T.

Tim2
Premium
join:2006-06-19

reply to ColorBASIC

Re: Only 23% of all households? ONLY?!?

I could be wrong -- and someone please correct me if I am -- but I thought the 23% refers to the number of houses AT&T's television service will pass. Unless they become the dominant provider in that 23%, the numbers aren't going to be all that impressive as cable companies go.

Monday, 28-May 12:50:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics