Re: I think the question is...

Author	All Replies
Cod join:2000-07-05 Greensboro, NC edit: July 19th, @12:44PM	reply to Rick Re: I think the question is... Congrats, Rick!!! You remembered your password! 27 paragraphs this time. Guess what? Same rehashed F.U.D. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear%2C_un···nd_doubt you post time and time again. I've never seen someone have a chub like you do for the telco's, bro. Amusing stuff nonetheless...The entertainment value alone is priceless.
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-07-19 12:43:56 ·
Rick Premium,MVM join:2001-02-06 Waterbury, CT clubs:	said by Cod : Congrats, Rick!!! You remembered your password! (I wasn't aware that I had forgotten it) 27 paragraphs this time. Guess what? Same rehashed F.U.D. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear%2C_un···nd_doubt you post time and time again. (rehashed? Maybe. But as long as nothing changes..it needs to be said) I've never seen someone have a chub like you do for the telco's, bro. (I have no problems whatsoever with Verizon and THEIR strategy. Because it's the right one. For them..and the consumers who live in their service area) Amusing stuff nonetheless...The entertainment value alone is priceless. (Well, I guess I'm glad you're this easily entertained. I don't post what I do as entertainment however. In my view, it's the plain facts. I notice what you and others don't do however is to come up with anything to dispute them. Is that because they're accurate? Are the telco's losing millions of customers to voip and the cable providers? Is Comcast's and other cable co's HSI speeds leaving telco totally in the dust? Is Video and hdtv now and going to be the driving force behind the need for speed? Do YOU think that Uverse is really an answer to it all..and is truly a Next generation service? Or, is it easier to just bash me for my opinions? Sadly, I think many of my predictions dating back here a year and more already are all coming to pass. And, I think the very dismal adoption of uverse is all the proof of that. All my posts in the world aren't making that happen. It's the service that is making that happen. Don't shoot me.. I'm just speaking what I see as the truth) -- The Coyote captured the RR! Roadrunner Rick is now Comcastic!
Rick Premium,MVM join:2001-02-06 Waterbury, CT clubs:	to forum · permalink · · 2007-07-19 13:09:57 ·
dowhattowho @alltel.net	AT&T will be just fine. television is changing to switched digital video and time shifted video,perfect for IPTV.AT&T has everything it needs,a global backbone-AT&T WIRELESS-a huge fiber CO to CO infrastructure. All its competitors pay to use its network. Sprint objected to the merger of Bellsouth and AT&T because 99% of its cell phone traffic would be over AT&T local networks $$ cha-ching $$ cha-ching $$ for AT&T. Cable pays the PSTN (AT&T)to complete phone calls $$ and for their internet traffic $$. Cable is investing millions for voice customers,something AT&T knows is dead,In a very short time your cell phone will bluetooth to your router GOODBYE CABLE VOIP All this money stays with AT&T. NOW look at cable paying other companies to transport voice traffic-internet traffic-cell phone service and if you look at IPTV cable has big problems,A 1GHZ 500 cable node (most are 750 & 860MHZ systems)and you have 50% take-up rate,Thats 250 customers on the node you get 24mbps down and .18mbps up for each customer almost as good as AT&T U-VERSE. CableLabs had it right,cable needs to spend more money.If you look at VZ its not just fttp,its trunk fiber cables running out to the edge of a CO service area. the CO to the NORTH SOUTH EAST AND WEST doing the same thing, any unused fibers will link CO to CO for one hell of a lan network (DO YOU WANT TO PLAY A GAME). VZ said it needs 33% take rate. TELCO CABLE SATELLITE all with 33% works for me.
dowhattowho @alltel.net	to forum · permalink · 2007-07-20 00:32:09 ·


Tuesday, 02-Dec 12:54:17	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com. page compression OFF