<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Google should have it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18712421</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:08:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:08:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18713449</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1465905"><b>Richard B</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Rob <A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Jonbo298 <A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Open access for all. Its what the FCC wants, its what Google is offering, for a sizeable amount of money. I don't want a company like Verizon or at&t buying it, then restricting it to just their stuff. We've seen how *great* it is :uhh:<br> </DIV>The problem is Google is going at this all the wrong way. The proper and correct way is to hire tons of lobbyists who will line the pockets of the FCC's commissioners and in turn give Google what they want.   ;)<br> </DIV>What you think Google has been doing. The got the ear of a form Clinton appointee in the FCC to rig the 700Mhz auction with ope access restrictions. This in turn would drive away the big boys and drives down the bid for Google. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18713449</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:47:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Cabal <A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Is 12 enough for you? ;)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/19/AR2007061902058.html" >www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co&middot;&middot;&middot;058.html</A><br><br>They've been at it since October 2005, actually.<br> </DIV>Only 12? hehe. <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - It's Your IP .. and <I>more</I>!<br><A HREF="http://www.rr.cx"> rr.cx </A> - Personal Site.. coming soon.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712547</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:44:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712535</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : Is 12 enough for you? ;)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/19/AR2007061902058.html" >www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co&middot;&middot;&middot;058.html</A><br><br>They've been at it since October 2005, actually.<br><SMALL>--<br>Interested in <A HREF="http://www.enginuity.org/">open source engine management</A> for your Subaru?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712535</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:42:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Jonbo298 <A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Open access for all. Its what the FCC wants, its what Google is offering, for a sizeable amount of money. I don't want a company like Verizon or at&t buying it, then restricting it to just their stuff. We've seen how *great* it is :uhh:<br> </DIV>The problem is Google is going at this all the wrong way. The proper and correct way is to hire tons of lobbyists who will line the pockets of the FCC's commissioners and in turn give Google what they want.   ;)<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - It's Your IP .. and <I>more</I>!<br><A HREF="http://www.rr.cx"> rr.cx </A> - Personal Site.. coming soon.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712421</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:23:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><b>Jonbo298</b></A> : oh and I'm a democrat. I don't see the problem in letting Google have it. Put stipulation that if they don't follow on their promise, fine them heavily, much more then at&t has been allowed to get away with after the merger]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712114</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:39:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Google should have it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><b>Jonbo298</b></A> : Open access for all. Its what the FCC wants, its what Google is offering, for a sizeable amount of money. I don't want a company like Verizon or at&t buying it, then restricting it to just their stuff. We've seen how *great* it is :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18712106</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:37:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
