<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Porting # from SR to Packet8&#x27; in forum &#x27;Teleblend&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18713405</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:34:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:34:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18972179</link>
<description><![CDATA[MyTechLife posted : I also canceled P8 on 8/16, and my port to a different carrier is already complete - see my post &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r18972145-">Re: Has anybody COMPLETED porting to their new provider?</A><br><br>I'm still waiting for my equipment return receipt from P8 - which I sent on 8/17.<br><SMALL>--<br>Check out my website: <A HREF="http://www.renowirelessinfo.com">www.renowirelessinfo.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18972179</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:14:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18966281</link>
<description><![CDATA[muimui8 posted : I canceled Pack8 on 8/16/07, 8 days after sign up b/c I got no LNP status on-line.  I got the same e-mail you got on 8/16/07 saying that the LNP is in process. I got an e-mail on 8/17/07 with RMA number and instruction to return the equipment.  I just got an e-mail dated 8/27/07 saying "We have both of the forms needed to submit to our carrier...".  It appears that they started the LNP process the day I cancel with them and just processed the forms needed to submit to CLEC.  But I'm with another provider already trying to port my number.... I'm going to be very upset if they screw up my porting with my new provider.  What's going on with you?<br>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18966281</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:28:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18930261</link>
<description><![CDATA[christcorp posted : Besides sympathy, all I can say is that if you already have the "Porting" process in progress with packet8, then you are asking for worse troubles if you know try to call up teleblend and have anything done with that number. <br><br>I know that Packet8 and MANY other providers are fighting this exact same battle trying to get ex-sunrocket numbers released. The gaining provider can only keep pressuring the clec who has to pressuring the losing provider. I know it sucks, but as I said many providers are having this problem with SunRocket/Teleblend. <br><br>If you sign with Teleblend in hopes of getting your number and canceling Packet8, you may or may not get the number back. Then you will be starting all over again later which still could take the 4-6 weeks to port.<br><br>I don't speak for any of the providers; including Packet8; but some of the provider's leaders I've spoken with feel confident that by the end of the month most of these headaches should be behind them. In other words, they feel that they are making progress with the clecs and the politics involved. Especially for those who never signed up for the taliban. That in no way is me or anyone else telling you that you should stay with Packet8 or anyone else you are having the similar problem with thinking you are guaranteed to have everything done in the next 7-10 days. Only that they are working on it and feel that progress is being made. You have to decide for yourselves. Just understand the risk however. You could call teleblend and they might be able to give you number back immediately. However, it could already be released to the clec and it could take you just as much time or more to get it back then to stay and continue to put pressure on the providers.<br><br>Anyway, that's my $0.0245343 Take it for what it's worth. Later.... Mike..... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18930261</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 21:03:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929267</link>
<description><![CDATA[n8mack33 posted : I'm in the same boat.  I signed up on July 20th and still haven't had my number ported.  I am trying to determine if I can sign up with Teleblend for a month just to have my number forwarded to my cell phone until Packet 8 gets this sorted out.  I am on hold with Teleblend right now, but I know I can't trust anything they say so I'm hoping someone here will give me some ideas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929267</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:41:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929242</link>
<description><![CDATA[srsucks posted : I called packet 8 today to find out what the heck is going on with the porting. I signed up with them on the 20th of July and I still don't have my numbers ported yet. After being on hold for 10 minutes I was told that Sunrocket will not release my numbers and what really sucks is we paid $200 for a 3rd line for business and only got 2 months worth of use from it. They are now working under the name Teleblend which everyone on here already knows. The operator said that they had a list of the numbers that Sunrocket had and then they slowly started disappearing so after doing an investigation they found out that Sunrocket is refusing to release those numbers and she said that's against the law and Packet 8 has filed a compliant with the FCC. She said what Sunrocket is trying to do is get people to call Teleblend and then try to get the customer to sign up with them in order to get their number back. I hate this crap so much and am thinking about just getting a damn normal phone line so I don't have to deal with this. I wouldn't be so pissed if I could get my $200 back.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929242</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:38:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929117</link>
<description><![CDATA[n8mack33 posted : I forgot to mention that I would like to only sign up with Teleblend for a month or so until Packet 8 gets the number ported to Packet 8.<br><br>Teleblend told me over the phone that the number is gone, and that the only way I could activate it would be to sign up with them.  This is ethically and legally wrong it seems to me, but I don't know what choice I have.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929117</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:18:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929031</link>
<description><![CDATA[n8mack33 posted : Someone please help!  I have been wading through these forums all day and have been on the phone with Packet 8 and even Teleblend.<br><br>Packet 8 is blaming Teleblend for not releasing my number.  I checked and it seems to be a Level 3 number. A supervisor said they are taking my case to the FCC.  Somehow I don't think that will amount to much.  In the meantime, I HAVE passed my 30 day period to cancel and still no port available.<br><br>Here is my question: is there anything I can do to get my old sunrocket number activated as soon as possible.  I would even be willing to sign up with Teleblend.  I don't even care about the equipment, I just have calls forwarded to my cell phone.  I have the number on a bunch of signs and customers are going to think I'm out of business if I don't do something quick.  Packet 8 seems to be implying that it could be weeks before the number is ported, and I can't afford to wait that long.  Is there a chance I will lose the number all together?  It will be expensive to have signs remade, but I can't go another 2-4 weeks without having the correct number on my signs.<br><br>Please help.  Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18929031</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:05:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18919447</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Hi, I've been reading this thread for some time to track my own problem.  My SR number was with Global Crossing and it took a little over 3 weeks (07/21 -> 08/16) and now all is well. <br>Peace, Victor.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18919447</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:12:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914081</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : FYI, i was not trying to use two different anon names.  However, I am pissed, but I want my number ported and I want to make sure that user hear my experience for the horrible customer service from packet 8.  <br><br>I called 3-4 times and not once i could speak to a manager, and they said someone would call me back and not once they called me back.  My sales rep that signed me up lied and the support is hossible, and i dont have my phone number.  So i hope you can understand why i am extremely unhappy. <br><br>FYI, i found this site dslreports via google for porting problems for sunrocket to packet8. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914081</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:36:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914354</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : Leave the Packet 8 customers alone, this is a serious issue and should be left open to anyone during this time of serious issues.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914354</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:08:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914011</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : No I am not a troll.  I am an unhappy customer.  I did not recall <br><br>As you can see porting is an issue for sunrocket customers.  I am pissed off as hell because they lied to me. <br><br>It really that simple.  Maybe this is not a big deal to you but if you had a number for 15-20 yrs, and all of a sudden no one can reach you then its a big deal.  Its really that simple. <br><br>I posted in two posts because I wanted to make sure that users get help and if enough users have been lied to (keyword is if) then they should complain and let Packet8 know that signing up customers in a deceiving manner is unacceptable.  I can not speak for everyone but more me, i am unhappy that this and the fact that there customer server manager will not call me back or will not speak to me when i call. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18914011</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:18:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18913837</link>
<description><![CDATA[christcorp posted : You just posted in another P8 thread recommending the BBB and FTC. Of course there you signed in also as an anon poster, but with the name Packet8customer. Sorry, if you sign up and log in here I and others MIGHT take you seriously. If not, then there is little chance in hell of anyone thinking of you as anything more than a troll. later...Mike...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18913837</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:50:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18913811</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Important Note;  If p[acket8 has lied to you about the porting process, as they have to me.  Then please report them to the FTC and BBB. Info below. <br><br>NOTE:  Call and complain to packet8 about the porting problem and they will give you a second month for free as well.  AGAIN I DO not want an 2ndnd free month, I would rather have the number transferred as promised, or I should receive a response at least. <br><br>I was a sunrocket customer, I signed up with Packet8 since the sleezy sales rep said porting will take 2-3 days because they are also on teh level3 network and because they are preferred partner of sunrocket.  <br><br>Its been over a month since I have signed up with packet 8.  I called 3-4 times, the manager was never available and on top of that the managers never called back. <br><br>I have filed  complaint with the BBB and am writing to FTC, since the sales rep lied, and they have tied up my number. <br><br>BBB: &raquo;<A HREF="https://odr.bbb.org/odrweb/public/GetStarted.aspx" >odr.bbb.org/odrweb/public/GetStarted.aspx</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup" >rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup</A><br><br>File a complaint so that they know its not ok to lie to potential customers.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18913811</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:47:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18888353</link>
<description><![CDATA[muimui8 posted : I called this morning to cancel and got through to CS for the first time after signup. I also got the same e-mail on LNP.  I will call to cancel again if I don't get the e-mail with RMA instruction.  Let's all keep good record of what happened just in case for CC dispute. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18888353</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:17:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18886367</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fluxxer posted : When I called and canceled it was in the evening so I didn't receive the RMA letter till about 2pm the next day. Right now my adapter is on the way to Sunnyvale, CA. thru UPS and is supposed to be delivered tomorrow. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18886367</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:35:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18886299</link>
<description><![CDATA[MyTechLife posted : I called to cancel Packet8 this morning - 29 days after signing-up. The reason I gave them was no progress on porting.  The CS rep also checked and found no status update. She offered to "escalate" the issue, but I declined since it was escalated 2x before.<br><br>I was told I would get an e-mail today with my cancellation confirmation and an RMA to return the equipment. 30 minutes later I received the following e-mails:<br><br><BLOCKQUOTE><br>Hi xxxxxx<br><br>Your LNP request was received and is in Progress. <br><br>Regards,<br>Packet8 Call Center Team.<br><br></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Still no cancellation request though. Will it take 29 days to get that e-mail?  :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br>Check out my website: <A HREF="http://www.renowirelessinfo.com">www.renowirelessinfo.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18886299</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:26:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18885678</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fluxxer posted : The thing of it is, Packet 8 and Teleblend brought this on themselves when they "paid" to be preferred phone providers for ex-Sunrocket folks. You would think that they would have put the resources in place if they knew there was going to be an influx of new customers. From my dealings with them, that wasn't the case. 1-2 hours on hold to be told the same "we're escalating the port" line. The night I called to order service it took me 8 minutes to get someone, 3 weeks later 1-2 hours on hold?<br><br>Plus the service wasn't that great as far as quality goes, echo, dropped words, etc. I for one am glad I'm done with them. It might have been a good service for some people (and I'm happy for them after what we all went thru), but not for me.<br><br>So if I'm impatient about services promised and never delivered, thats my right. Seeing how it is my money.<br><br>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18885678</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:54:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18884510</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : No offense, but I think some of you are a little impatient with things considering the amount of SR customers who are looking for new phone providers.  This SR thing hit pretty quick so these other companies are gonna take a little longer than normal in getting things setup for their new customers.  I signed up with P8 on July 20th with porting my number as well.  Here it is a little less than 4 weeks later and I am all set to go...number ported and all.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18884510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:33:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18883943</link>
<description><![CDATA[muimui8 posted : ATTCV told me that they could not port my numbers b/c GC owns them and they don't have contract with GC to port them.  I was not happy about it, but at least they were upfront about it.<br><br>I then decided to sign up with P8 last week because it is suppose to be #2 in voice quality (not true based on what I'm reading here).  I called to sign up because I want to make sure there are real people that I can talk to when I needed someone. But I soon found out that this is only true when you are a potential customer.  After signup, I could not get anyone to talk to me even if I'm willing to be place on HOLD.  Automated customer service hang up on me numerous times after a message saying something like "..too many callers and please try later..." I also could not get anyone to "live chat" with me because there's never an agent available.  It also terminates you after few attempts trying to get someone.<br><br>During my signup, I made sure the rep knows that there is a number to be ported and that number was input into my account.  She also told me how long it would take.  But when I logged in, there's nothing in the LNP status section.  Am I suppose to make another request online????  I did anyway, but online is telling me that my number is not eligible for porting w/o reason.  <br><br>Was I suppose to make LNP request online AGAIN after signup?  Those of you who have been talking to "someone"..<br>Can you tell me how can I get someone on the line so I can cancel?  Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18883943</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 23:37:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18875778</link>
<description><![CDATA[MyTechLife posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1470986" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1470986');">Fluxxer</a>:</SMALL><br><br>I went ahead an canceled my packet 8 service, got tired of the "we are escalating" line and the hours on hold just to hear it. Plus the service wasn't as good as it initially seemed, some echo and problems with the other person not being able to hear me...<br> </DIV>I'm about to cancel too. Your thoughts about their service are exactly what I've experienced. I've already reconfigured my SR adapter and signed up with CallCentric. Not sure if they'll do a better job at porting my old numbers - but at least they have local numbers available to issue.<br><SMALL>--<br>Check out my website: <A HREF="http://www.renowirelessinfo.com">www.renowirelessinfo.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18875778</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 21:39:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18875063</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fluxxer posted : I went ahead an canceled my packet 8 service, got tired of the "we are escalating" line and the hours on hold just to hear it. Plus the service wasn't as good as it initially seemed, some echo and problems with the other person not being able to hear me.<br><br>Funny thing was when I canceled it was like "Ok, we'll send out the cancellation email with instructions to send the adapter back." Which was kinda nice that I didn't have to deal with some retention agent. :)<br><br>Anyways, so I'm looking again for a new provider for my voip needs, currently using Grand Central and Skype which so far so good. Maybe I already found it /shrug lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18875063</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:56:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18873931</link>
<description><![CDATA[Quattrohead posted : Mine has just completed so they are working on it......but boy is it frustrating.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18873931</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:31:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18873285</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : I signed with Packet 8 on 7/30, they assured me at that time my number porting process had begun, today I received 3 seperate emails, all stating,<br>  "We have both of the forms needed to submit you application to our carrier. This<br>has been done, we are now processing your LNP application which can take about<br>2-4 weeks more not including errors in porting. We will do our best to expedite"<br><br>My LPN status on their web site has this to say,<br>  " Added    08/14/2007  8:30AM  Alva,Esther  <br> Summary  <br> LNP Case Status Email : 2007-08-14-08.30.00.000000  <br> Details  Application Submited"<br><br>No one at Packet 8 can explain what this means, I'm supposed to get a call back, yeah right.<br><br>Am I to believe that Packet 8 has waited 2 1/2 weeks before submitting forms to port my number ?????????]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18873285</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:01:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18872541</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : "In a widely anticipated decision issued March 1, 2007, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) granted a Petition for Declaratory Ruling filed by Time Warner Cable (TWC). TWC&#146;s petition, filed exactly one year ago, asked the FCC to declare that telecommunications carriers are entitled, pursuant to Sections 251(a) and (b) of the Communications Act, to interconnect with incumbent local exchange carriers in order to provide public switched telephone network (PSTN) connectivity and other telecommunications services to providers of interconnected Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service."<br><br>"..The FCC ruled "the classification of a third-party provider&#146;s VoIP service as an information service or a telecommunications service is irrelevant to the issue of whether a wholesale provider of telecommunications may seek interconnection under Section 251(a) and (b). What matters is that the wholesale carrier is providing telecommunications for a fee; the type of service the carrier&#146;s customer is providing (in this case, VoIP) is not relevant..."  <br><br>"..The order clarifies that CLECs serving interconnected VoIP providers must provide number portability pursuant to section 52.23 of the FCC&#146;s rules when a VoIP provider&#146;s customer changes carriers..." <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.telecomlawblog.com/fcc-daily-fcc-order-clarifies-interconnection-rights-of-carriers-serving-voip-providers.html" >www.telecomlawblog.com/fcc-daily&middot;&middot;&middot;ers.html</A><br><br>If TWC did not think the FCC had jurisdiction, they wouldn't have filed.  If the FCC did not believe they had the authority, they wouldn't have granted the petition. Unless I am missing something, the FCC clearly ruled that VoIP can port their numbers. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18872541</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 14:25:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18870700</link>
<description><![CDATA[MyTechLife posted : On July 17 I ordered P8, 2 days later I submitted my LNP request. Here I am in week #4 without a ported, local number. It wouldn't be quite so bad if P8 offered a local number to me in the first place like SR did.<br><br>I now have only 4 days left to cancel. No update whatsoever on the P8 web portal on the status of my port. Several calls have promised to escalate things - it's only escalated my blood pressure. <br><SMALL>--<br>Check out my website: <A HREF="http://www.renowirelessinfo.com">www.renowirelessinfo.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18870700</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:01:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18867667</link>
<description><![CDATA[benad76 posted : I actually started this discussion on the other thread discussing Teleblend TOS. Someone said FCC this, computer crimes that. <br><br>I think I read where Teleblend is not even a U.S. Company. I know they have some kind of agreement to use a legit US company to help manage, but is Teleblend's parent company subject to US laws? <br><br>I mean, if they do business here, but their corporate office is in Sri Lanka somewhere, how could they be fined or made to comply?  Will the FBI pull their plug for not operating under US laws correctly?  <br><br>I don't think so.<br><br>Be Well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18867667</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:19:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18867258</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : I agree with both of the last 2 posts, Sunrocket gave me the impression their accounts for home office and residential were the same.  <br><br>I don't know why us home office users are being jumped on here by other posters, they seem misinformed.<br><br>I'm still waiting for my number to port, it's going on 3 weeks.  This is obviously hurting my business.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18867258</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:19:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866325</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cogdis posted : Henry I don't know about your situation, but my cousin called sunrocket last year looking for a business line.  They said they're business line is the same price as the residential package.  I have a feeling that they sold it as a business package to anybody who was looking for one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866325</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:00:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866317</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : I have a home office and I enrolled with SR using a business name.  I remember SR assuring me this was fine.  More important than any verbal or written assurances by individual employees, I am certain that reasonable home office use was allowed in SR's TOS.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866317</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:00:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866157</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : "Home Office use consistent with residential use was not a violation of TOS. Similar language was included under acceptable use in SR's TOS."<br><br>from a previous poster, ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866157</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:38:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866133</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : It would be nice to find the original TOS from Sunrocket in 2005, however, when a Representative tells you the terms prior to engaging their service you do have recourse, of course proving this is another story.  Based upon Sunrockets prior and recent history I'd imagine that I do have a case.  Also my phone records and the fact that I had operated within their TOS in that there was not excessive usage and the usage was within "normal home office usage patterns".<br><br>Why you choose to defend Sunrocket is beyond me, based upon the company's TOS and their recent business practices I believe I have a reasonable gripe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18866133</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:36:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865987</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : From TB TOS:<br><br>You are expressly prohibited from using the Service for ... any other activity that results in excessive usage inconsistent with normal residential or home office usage patterns.<br><br>I believe this is identical to the wording in SR's TOS. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865987</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:14:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865789</link>
<description><![CDATA[christcorp posted : look Henry; you're trying to put in a Gentleman's handshake with the law. The customer service person on the phone will tell you anything you want to hear to get you to sign up. Unfortunately, you don't have any hard proof of that. And, unfortunately for you, most states fall under what in the legal profession is called the "4 corner law". Meaning, if it isn't within the 4 corners of a piece of paper, then it doesn't exist. The 4 corners of SunRocket's TOS states that it's for residential use. Rationalize it anyway you want. That is what any lawyer you want to pay is going to tell you. later... Mike....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865789</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:39:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865608</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : When I signed with Sunrocket 2 years ago they said I should have NO PROBLEM using their service with a home based  business.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18865608</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:12:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18863697</link>
<description><![CDATA[rbsummers posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by WifyPoo :</SMALL><BR><BR>In fact you probably planned to use TB for a short period only, which is not illegal, but also not "honorable" thing to do. So don't be surprised when they screw you back.<br> </DIV>Actually, it was not illegal, and it was also not "not honorable" - TeleBlend was offering a month-to-month service, no contract required - so you could use them for one month, or as long as you wanted to stay with them. So I don't appreciate being screwed back, by a company that not following it's own statements.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18863697</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:24:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18856540</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : dmolavi,<br><br>Thank you for all of the info you have provided.  I have an unlocked Innomedia and an AC-211-SR.  I have no problems logging into either.  I was unable to establish service with TeleBlend on the Innomedia after I had performed a factory reset.  I thought I needed the user and PW info from TeleBlend to establish service.  I selected Nuvio since it had clear instructions for both adapters. It only took a few minutes to setup two new accounts with Nuvio. <br><br>As soon as I realized that TeleBlend was unable to provide the promised level of service I decided to go with another provider.  <br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18856540</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 00:04:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18855702</link>
<description><![CDATA[dmolavi posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1021612" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1021612');">ryeny3</a>:</SMALL><br><br>Since I reset my adapter after SunRocket flamed out, I can't configure my adapters w/o the user ID and PW from TeleBlend. I filed a ticket on 7/19. Once I realized that this info wasn't coming, I set up accounts with Nuvio and I was making calls a few minutes later.<br> </DIV>which ATA do you have?  for the AC-211-SR (and N) and innomedia, try the site in my .sig for passwords.  if you have the AC-211, my site also has two programs that you can run to figure out the password.<br><SMALL>--<br>Get your Gizmo Admin Passwords, Unlock Instructions, and How To use your Gizmo with other providers at &raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com" >gizmopasswords.blogspot.com</A><br><A HREF="http://www.nukedgallery.net">NukedGallery.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18855702</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:46:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18854325</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : When I called Nuvio about my number being snatched back, the rep thought I had just called.  A coworker had just told him a similar story a few minutes before and he was surprised to hear that I had the same problem.  <br><br>Since the services are less that those advertised when I paid TeleBlend on 7/18, I filed complaints with the FCC and the Internet Crime Complaint Center.  I also described the porting problem.<br><br>Since I reset my adapter after SunRocket flamed out, I can't configure my adapters w/o the user ID and PW from TeleBlend. I filed a ticket on 7/19. Once I realized that this info wasn't coming, I set up accounts with Nuvio and I was making calls a few minutes later.<br><br>On 7/20, I filed a ticket with TeleBlend stating that I did not want to transfer my number to them.  I also notified them that I intended to port my numbers to Nuvio.<br><br>I am trying to forward my calls with limited success. On one account callers are disconnected after a few seconds.  On the other account callers are told my number is disconnected. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18854325</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:09:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18853280</link>
<description><![CDATA[Hosed in WI posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1397583" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1397583');">TeleBlendBL</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>While I do not doubt what "Hosed in WI" has been told and the sincerity of his/her frustration in understanding the root cause of this issue, TeleBlend is not party to it. </DIV>Unfortunately TeleblendBL I am not the only one being told this, not the only one filing FCC complaints, nor the only one who's porting is hung up because of Teleblend's incompetence.<br><br>I honestly don't believe they are doing it on purpose (but I am a trusting kind of guy).  I just think they are a group of opportunists who jumped in to make a quick buck and have yet to figure out how to run their systems.<br><br>If we are lucky Teleblend will quickly pull their collective heads out of their a$$es and clean our numbers out of their system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18853280</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 11:29:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18852650</link>
<description><![CDATA[dmolavi posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by CharlieL7 :</SMALL><br><br>TeleblendBL - can you give us any hint when Teleblend will have it's own web site where we can see what features we're actually getting and how we'll be able to control them? It's strange going to the SR site, and even stranger when TB tech support swears that the Sunrocket site doesn't affect TB accounts, while of course it does. <br> </DIV>most likely, they're just going to retool the SR site and rebrand it w/ TB logos, since they apparantly have taken over the SR infrastructure. &raquo;<A HREF="https://www.myteleblend.net/documents/Teleblend%20PR%20072707.pdf" >www.myteleblend.net/documents/Te&middot;&middot;&middot;2707.pdf</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Get your Gizmo Admin Passwords, Unlock Instructions, and How To use your Gizmo with other providers at &raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com" >gizmopasswords.blogspot.com</A><br><A HREF="http://www.nukedgallery.net">NukedGallery.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18852650</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:01:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18852189</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : TeleblendBL - can you give us any hint when Teleblend will have it's own web site where we can see what features we're actually getting and how we'll be able to control them? It's strange going to the SR site, and even stranger when TB tech support swears that the Sunrocket site doesn't affect TB accounts, while of course it does. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18852189</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 03:03:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18851825</link>
<description><![CDATA[voiplover posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1476497" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1476497');">HenryDavid</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR><SMALL>On July 30th Packet 8 assured me that my old number would be ringing by Aug. 1st.  I didn't even receive the replacement gizmo until Aug. 2nd.  They then PROMISED me that within 7-10 days my number would be ported.  2 weeks later and no porting, all they can say now is to wait and perhaps in 4-6 weeks the number will be ported.  2 lies, no service, yet they have my money.  Today a rep. from packet8 told me that "originally they were telling customers 7-10 days would complete the porting, now however due to some illegal activity by Teleblend the porting processes are being held up", this statement came directly from the Packet8 representative.  This better not be true !!</SMALL><br> </DIV>Rest assured that if you didn't sign up for TB service and they did a pull on your number after it ported to P8, they will be fried at the stake by the FCC, The clecs are heavily regulated on their paper trails (one of the big reasons for voip ports taking longer) that the clecs will turn over ALL the info with out regards....<br>TB will then be liable to you also. They do not own the number. You do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18851825</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:55:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18850506</link>
<description><![CDATA[dmolavi posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1476497" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1476497');">HenryDavid</a>:</SMALL><br><br>On July 30th Packet 8 assured me that my old number would be ringing by Aug. 1st.  I didn't even receive the replacement gizmo until Aug. 2nd.  They then PROMISED me that within 7-10 days my number would be ported.  2 weeks later and no porting, all they can say now is to wait and perhaps in 4-6 weeks the number will be ported.  2 lies, no service, yet they have my money.  Today a rep. from packet8 told me that "originally they were telling customers 7-10 days would complete the porting, now however due to some illegal activity by Teleblend the porting processes are being held up", this statement came directly from the Packet8 representative.  This better not be true !!<br> </DIV>read this thread, and i think, one other here on DSLR. It does seem like TB is doing something here...<br><SMALL>--<br>Get your Gizmo Admin Passwords, Unlock Instructions, and How To use your Gizmo with other providers at &raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com" >gizmopasswords.blogspot.com</A><br><A HREF="http://www.nukedgallery.net">NukedGallery.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18850506</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:39:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18850479</link>
<description><![CDATA[HenryDavid posted : On July 30th Packet 8 assured me that my old number would be ringing by Aug. 1st.  I didn't even receive the replacement gizmo until Aug. 2nd.  They then PROMISED me that within 7-10 days my number would be ported.  2 weeks later and no porting, all they can say now is to wait and perhaps in 4-6 weeks the number will be ported.  2 lies, no service, yet they have my money.  Today a rep. from packet8 told me that "originally they were telling customers 7-10 days would complete the porting, now however due to some illegal activity by Teleblend the porting processes are being held up", this statement came directly from the Packet8 representative.  This better not be true !!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18850479</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:34:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18848343</link>
<description><![CDATA[ryeny3 posted : Now that TeleBlend has snatched back my ported numbers, on one account callers hear the number has been disconnected or out of service.  I am able to forward calls on the other line.<br><br>I continue to submit trouble tickets, since I have not been able to reach TeleBlend by phone.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18848343</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:02:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846872</link>
<description><![CDATA[dmolavi posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by tequilla :</SMALL><br><br>Well to teleblendbl, i wish to make it clear that i transitioned to teleblend successfully and sucessfully had both my incomming and outgoing jeopardized, unabashedly by the great teleblend. It does not seem to be a problem just with me but with thousands others who sucessfully blended with teleblend. I have no outgoing or incomming, and phones to their CSR says " all circuits are busy..." i am just horrifed to see that this is just a copy of the sunrocket problem, they went out without informing and now super(tele)blend, did the same i.e. temporarily shut down without informing its paid subscribers. Is there no body who can curtail such malpractices and shody dealings in this country. This is a rip off and teleblendbl is here to make blending of this issue, may be you are given a satellite phone to talk to that frog or fogg whatever his name is..... as all circuits are busy at this time at teleblend.<br> </DIV>dispute the charges w/ your CC and file an FCC complaint. once the banks and the feds start knocking on their doors, maybe they'll get off their asses and fix things, if it isn't too late.<br><SMALL>--<br>Get your Gizmo Admin Passwords, Unlock Instructions, and How To use your Gizmo with other providers at &raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com" >gizmopasswords.blogspot.com</A><br><A HREF="http://www.nukedgallery.net">NukedGallery.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846872</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:47:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846840</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Well to teleblendbl, i wish to make it clear that i transitioned to teleblend successfully and sucessfully had both my incomming and outgoing jeopardized, unabashedly by the great teleblend. It does not seem to be a problem just with me but with thousands others who sucessfully blended with teleblend. I have no outgoing or incomming, and phones to their CSR says " all circuits are busy..." i am just horrifed to see that this is just a copy of the sunrocket problem, they went out without informing and now super(tele)blend, did the same i.e. temporarily shut down without informing its paid subscribers. Is there no body who can curtail such malpractices and shody dealings in this country. This is a rip off and teleblendbl is here to make blending of this issue, may be you are given a satellite phone to talk to that frog or fogg whatever his name is..... as all circuits are busy at this time at teleblend.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846840</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:42:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846834</link>
<description><![CDATA[guppy_fish posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1397583" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1397583');">TeleBlendBL</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>The reason I can't comment on any Packet8 FCC action is because I am not privy to it and thus it would be inappropriate for me to speculate on its validity.<br> </DIV>Why don't you just pack you spam some where else. Your nothing more than a paid for third party shill for TeleTubby.<br><br>You have no data to provide, everything you say within a day or two gets proven wrong ... bottom line is BBR folks know the real deal whats going on, even with paid shills posting here claiming the "want to help" the poor SR customers<br><br>All <B>YOU</B> want is your commission payment ... here's a free one, your never going to get a dime as Teletubby won't be around in a month]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846834</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:41:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846796</link>
<description><![CDATA[dmolavi posted : While I appreciate your response, I'm sure you are still biased towards the company that writes you a check.  <br><br>Regardless, I doubt TB will continue to operate as a viable corporation given the negative publicity that has surrounded it since it's inception.  Why? Consider the problems experienced this week.  Customers who don't know about DSLR probably won't tolerate a week+ of no phone service, they'll go somewhere else. Or, they'll Google around and see these threads. Customers who do know about DSLR either won't sign up, or will do so just to save their number, and then leave. My unscientific poll of DSLR readers shows about 81% will do just that. That's a high enough attrition rate to sink any company.<br><SMALL>--<br>Get your Gizmo Admin Passwords, Unlock Instructions, and How To use your Gizmo with other providers at &raquo;<A HREF="http://gizmopasswords.blogspot.com" >gizmopasswords.blogspot.com</A><br><A HREF="http://www.nukedgallery.net">NukedGallery.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846796</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:36:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Porting # from SR to Packet8</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846748</link>
<description><![CDATA[TeleBlendBL posted : Once again, my post above is crystal clear regarding TeleBlend's position on the issue. As far as being the "PR" person not much to say there. Folks here knew me and my sincerity in helping SunRocket customers in my former life and I think most know my intentions are always in good faith and I'm not just going to post something because it sounds good. I post based on all information available to me at the time and have ALWAYS been forthright and honest in that regard. I'm especially sensitive to it with former SunRocket customers because, as I've stated multiple times, I think the manner in which customers were left was unspeakable.<br><br>I can sit here and tell you that the majority of TeleBlend customers have transitioned successfully, but that doesn't really matter because the customer who is having problems isn't really going to be helped or assuaged that other customers are doing fine. <br><br>I can tell you this: Significant progress has been made as TeleBlend transitions customers and gets things up and running. Given the circumstances under which things occurred the process was not going to be perfect, but it will get better. For some, understandably, this progress may not come fast enough and that is a decision each individual will have to make. But TeleBlend has put in place a service and offering that will serve customers for years to come. Again, I'll leave it to each existing and potential customer to determine what works best for them.<br><br>If you have questions feel free to PM me. Again, I'm here to keep the lines of communication open between TB and the customers. As I type this I know some will respond skeptically and that I understand.<br><br>The reason I can't comment on any Packet8 FCC action is because I am not privy to it and thus it would be inappropriate for me to speculate on its validity.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Porting-from-SR-to-Packet8-18846748</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:28:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

