<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Utorrent bought by MPAA&#x27; in forum &#x27;Filesharing Software&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728335</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:49 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:24:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18763304</link>
<description><![CDATA[sikk posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1457141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1457141');">hihi9</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>people do not use utorrent anymore <br>it's evil the creator is mpaa,riaa<br>they did it so they would know who exactly is your ip<br>very clever, they have hackers working with them<br>i'm not surprised by this news<br>i knew it all along, ur had it coming u u utorrent braggers<br>go back to using bitcomet, azureus or bittornado<br>those are the best and will remain the best<br> </DIV>LAWL @ this post.  <br><br>From the link, I got that the &micro;Torrent's parent company "cooperated" with the MPAA by removing certain links from their website.  I don't see anywhere where it is said that the MPAA now owns &micro;Torrent or BitTorrent Inc.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18763304</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:06:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18762819</link>
<description><![CDATA[hihi9 posted : i'm not talking about 100 percent file thought so dunno what i'm talking about. try something less then 100 percent.<br>btw i did not use 4 different client, only 3 and that's probably already too complicated for most ppl <br>i think u use utorrent exclusive thats why u have no ideas what i'm talking about. i've used many other clients as well ya know but they just keep perishing like torrentstorm, abc etc.. so many experiments not one client is perfect. why so many client you say? well i like flexibility, and because each client has its weakness and strength. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18762819</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:38:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18762366</link>
<description><![CDATA[MmmPancakes posted : Umm, so who exactly uses 4 different BT clients anyways?<br><br>Of course you're going to get some rollbacks if you download the file from Client A and then hashcheck it on Client B.  The most I've ever experienced with uTorrent is that it rolls my 100% completed file to 99.7%.  Wow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18762366</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:49:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18756851</link>
<description><![CDATA[hihi9 posted : let me explain that again..<br>if ur just using utorrent exclusively u will have clue of what i am talking about<br>if u use utorrent,azur,bittornado,bitcomet<br>u will find that utorrent is incompatible with other client when resuming an incomplete file<br>so in order to use utorrent, u have to download from scratch<br>otherwise it will mess up your incomplete file <br>azur has a feature that if it's bitcomet incomplete file it will fix a few bytes so you get the full percentage<br>with bittornado you lose a few percentage but not a big deal<br>ex. at 80% incomplete from bitcomet going to bittornado, it will drop to 78%<br><br>i'm sorry if this is too complicated for you but i have explain it as best i can.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18756851</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:29:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751927</link>
<description><![CDATA[TOPDAWG posted : You can do that with utorrent to fact is I've done it before.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751927</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:07:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751913</link>
<description><![CDATA[TOPDAWG posted : What you say? utorrent send us a bomb?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751913</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:06:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751739</link>
<description><![CDATA[hihi9 posted : people do not use utorrent anymore <br>it's evil the creator is mpaa,riaa<br>they did it so they would know who exactly is your ip<br>very clever, they have hackers working with them<br>i'm not surprised by this news<br>i knew it all along, ur had it coming u u utorrent braggers<br>go back to using bitcomet, azureus or bittornado<br>those are the best and will remain the best<br><br>serious problems with utorrent..<br>when rehash from an incomplete from bitcomet or bittornado<br>the percent download drop in half! wtf???<br>then when i rehash again with bitcomet or bittornado<br>it remain that way<br>ex i download at 50percent..with bitcomet,bittornado<br>rehashing again with utorrent <br>drop to 25 percent...it's evil and not flexible designed to frustrat u has hidden flaws bad bad bad client, i rarely use and today will not be using it at all.<br>this happens with any torrent as i have experienced]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751739</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:43:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751707</link>
<description><![CDATA[hihi9 posted : are u saying that if someone upload a private torrent to a site such as mininova.org<br>meganova.org<br>bitenova.dl torrentportal.com datorrents.com etc<br>someone who is not a member can leech off from it freely<br>as if it's a public torrent<br>now that's funny  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18751707</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:37:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18749810</link>
<description><![CDATA[shearer posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/377729" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=377729');">dvd536</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Is there a client patch that can change the client info sent to the tracker? I really love the speeds i get with utorrent.<br> </DIV>If you're wiling to go through the extra trouble, get Privoxy. It's a free HTTP proxy software and can change the http headers sent to the tracker.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18749810</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:18:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18743858</link>
<description><![CDATA[Omega posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/817255" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=817255');">Alcohol</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Stick to uTorrent 1.6 <br> </DIV>That is what I am doing.  As long as bitmetv does not ban utorrent v1.6 I will still keep on using it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18743858</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:11:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18738602</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ancalagon posted : Exactly, Bitcomet ignored the private flag and allowed the DHT network on private torrents.  It did a bunch of other stuff too but I can't remember now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18738602</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:33:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18737407</link>
<description><![CDATA[theyipper posted : Bitcomet was banned for not allowing private flag (always sharing with public which private trackers do not like).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18737407</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:54:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18737141</link>
<description><![CDATA[TOPDAWG posted : Bitcomet needs to make a come back. I never got why some sites banned it. Far as I know most sites banned it cause of the DHT network but hell utorrent has it too so WTF was the point? It seemed more to me one of the big sites banned it so the little ones followed suit cause the big bad cool site banned it.<br><br>Azureus  I hate it's takes way to much ram. Also with azureus I have a hard time surfing while running torrents with utorrent and bitcomet I never have that issue.<br><br>I think utorrent will still be safe but being as you can run it  without a install it's prefect for movie downloads you click a file and boom the program loads up and your torrent starts.<br><br>Also how does this bit torrent paying shit work? Do you download a DRM movie or whatever file and use your own bandwidth to give it to other people?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18737141</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:14:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736969</link>
<description><![CDATA[grandpinaple posted : Nah I use Windows. It was more of a kneejerk comment, but at the same time it is kinda true in the sense that at least with open source no code can hide itself.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736969</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:45:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736792</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ancalagon posted : ...dvd536, you realize all clients report what they are and the version #?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736792</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:13:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736008</link>
<description><![CDATA[The Flash posted : This is pretty old news<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1309231" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1309231');">grandpinaple</a>:</SMALL><br><br>Okay I guess fuck utorrent. Back to azureus. I should have known things that aren't open source are not to be trusted.<br> </DIV>Linux?<br><SMALL>--<br>Test your Speed<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest" >www.speakeasy.net/speedtest</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://speedtest.cogeco.net/" >speedtest.cogeco.net/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18736008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:14:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18735827</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : Is there a client patch that can change the client info sent to the tracker? I really love the speeds i get with utorrent.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18735827</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18734182</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ancalagon posted : There's only a few private trackers that are banning it (BitmeTV I think is one of the more prominent ones), OiNK, Torrent-Damage, and others allow it.  It's a big case of tin foil hatting, it doesn't report your data to the MPAA, you won't get sued, it's not selling out your IP.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18734182</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:36:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18733871</link>
<description><![CDATA[grandpinaple posted : Okay I guess fuck utorrent. Back to azureus. I should have known things that aren't open source are not to be trusted.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18733871</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:54:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18731624</link>
<description><![CDATA[Cozworth posted : Is 1.61 the same or is 1.6 the last "safe" option. <br><br>Guess which one I am using  :p  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18731624</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:10:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728825</link>
<description><![CDATA[MmmPancakes posted : You can just download the 1.6 exe file and overwrite the 1.7 exe file. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728825</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:27:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728719</link>
<description><![CDATA[BruceT posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/817255" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=817255');">Alcohol</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Stick to uTorrent 1.6 <br> </DIV>Do I just uninstall 1.7.2 and then reinstall 1.6? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728719</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:01:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728615</link>
<description><![CDATA[MmmPancakes posted : I think people just get paranoid because uTorrent is now being associated with the BitTorrent company.<br><br>See, if you never download illegal stuff with uT, which was not its programmed use anyways, then you won't have to worry.  But apparently you do and you panic.  Either live with it, downgrade to 1.6, switch to a different BT client, or don't download at all.  Because you get the same type of risks as long as you BitTorrent.<br><br>If they catch you, the worst that can happen is they send you a threat letter full of lawyer lingo that you can kindly put in the paper shredder.  Seriously, you probably have a better chance of winning the lottery than getting sued at this rate.<br><br>PS - You shouldn't read everything on the internet and believe it.  A lot of these articles are misinformed about how since uT and BT joined forces that the program started sending data to unwanted places, which is baloney.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728615</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:41:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728469</link>
<description><![CDATA[Alcohol posted : Stick to uTorrent 1.6 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728469</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:59:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Utorrent bought by MPAA</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728335</link>
<description><![CDATA[BruceT posted : Sorry for almost duplicate post. I thought I posted the first topic in wrong place! :( <br><br>Is it no longer safe? I did a google and found news about <A HREF="http://libcom.org/forums/news/utorrent-bought-mpaa">UTorrent and MPAA</A> What bit toreent client is everyone else using? Has anyone heard anything bad about UTorrent or the recent upgrade to 1.7.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Utorrent-bought-by-MPAA-18728335</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:22:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

