 ronpinImagine Reality
join:2002-12-06
Nirvana
1 edit | reply to Noah Vail
Re: All righty then You will've needed to have seriously considered deploying your own FTTH network to see what happened with the former unbundling efforts in the USA. There simply was no incentive for the "majors" to do it. Even in France it only makes sense for CLEC-FTTH -- in special dense areas.
Unbundling would stop nobody from making money in Manhattan NY. It would stop anybody in Manhattan KS
--
Instant bugging and GPS location info -- thanks to your cell phone and Bush's warrantless NSA! »news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6140191.html |
|
|
|
| said by ronpin:...Even in France it only makes sense for CLEC-FTTH -- in special dense areas. Unbundling would stop nobody from making money in Manhattan NY. It would stop anybody in Manhattan KS... Isn't that 'cherry picking'? |
|
ronpinImagine Reality
join:2002-12-06
Nirvana | said by viperlmw:Isn't that 'cherry picking'? Only on a neighborhood basis -- not on a borough or 'burb basis. Only a monopoly can afford to ignore demographics -- if that's what you really want 
--
Instant bugging and GPS location info -- thanks to your cell phone and Bush's warrantless NSA! »news.zdnet.com/2100-1035_22-6140191.html |
|
 Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
kudos:1
 ·Bright House
 ·Sprint Mobile Br..
| reply to ronpin
said by ronpin:Unbundling would stop nobody from making money in Manhattan NY. It would stop anybody in Manhattan KS Well, that would be in line with my suggestion. Unbundle in the densest 500 cities. I don't know how big Manhattan KS is, but Overland Park KS would be big enough.
Even though Unbundling wouldn't hurt bottom lines in Manhattan NY, Big Internet is actively opposing it, which would put you and them on opposite sides of the issue.
NV
--
The More Alike 2 Religions are, the Stronger the Hate between them. |
|
