republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Charter HSI/CATV » East Tennessee latency problems
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1306
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
A request to Charter Cable admin staff »
« Signal Levels  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6
AuthorAll Replies

morvix

join:2007-07-26
Kingsport, TN

reply to Pitchy
Re: East Tennessee latency problems

Yeah you may wanna also call in and say you are having an ongoing issue with network latency and that you would like to do a QCR test and forward the result to a tech. Hopefully they will figure out what you mean, QCR is the charter exe that just does a netstat and a bunch of other stuff and outputs it to the file. We are going through the same hops, look at my trace above, but my ms is decent.. So you may wanna just give them a ring since it does look like it occurs at a hop and not your router (they blame the router all the time), just a thought, I am going to wish for FiOS to come here tonight lol

IsdnWolf
Premium
join:2002-05-24
Cleveland, TN

reply to GreatPumpkin
Maint should be done this week. I have not heard anything to the contrary.

I am not going to be doing this maint, actually, I will probably sleep through it. Our network engineer in Tri-Cities will be doing the actual cut over. He is one of the best within Charter.

Some of you have noticed that certain blocks have latency while others do not. Just depends on which circuit that particular block is going through.

Do have to reboot the router in Cleveland. Doing that Wed. night at around midnight. Should only be down for around half an hour.


volntn
The Volunteer
Premium
join:2002-01-05
Cleveland, TN
clubs:
Thanks for the heads up Wolf.

morvix

join:2007-07-26
Kingsport, TN
reply to IsdnWolf
Kingsport went down from 2am - 8am Tues morn ISDN what was up? =) My ping to att is ok but still jumps 20ms just getting into the att hops, I would like 25ms pings to my game servers but alas just a dream

IsdnWolf
Premium
join:2002-05-24
Cleveland, TN

Ok.. Tuesday morning, our Network Engineer in Tri-Cities moved us to another ATT pipe..

More bandwidth and hopefully less latency..

Average latency is around 15-20 ms to Headend and between 30-50 ms accross the att network.. So you are looking at around 70 ms average.


Robot Legs

@wkpttv.com

what's the deal with at&T lately? several topics on here about at&t being the choke point. i don't recall my average ping being in the 70ms range a few months ago. seems to be a recent event and if the oc48 pipe doesn't take care of that then shouldn't it be time you guys look for another backbone provider?

Pitchy

join:2006-02-19
Kingsport, TN

Sadly I see no improvement. My ping times are still out-freaking-rageous. My game server is ping average is 173ms.

Yahoo ping is 166ms. Every server in 2142 is showing up amber or red, which are pretty much unplayable.

Tracing route to 8.6.8.55 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 3 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 8 ms 8 ms 7 ms 10.164.0.1
3 11 ms 22 ms 16 ms 24-158-109-225.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.109.225]
4 110 ms 112 ms 133 ms 24-158-96-226.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.96.226]
5 122 ms 123 ms 120 ms 12.86.91.73
6 130 ms 136 ms 135 ms tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.96.18]
7 123 ms 125 ms 125 ms 12.122.96.5
8 134 ms 127 ms 125 ms 192.205.34.62
9 134 ms 140 ms 159 ms ae-31-53.ebr1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.68.103.94]
10 138 ms 129 ms 127 ms ae-68.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.134.50]
11 153 ms 160 ms 159 ms ae-7.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.134.21]
12 166 ms 162 ms 164 ms ae-78.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.135.6]
13 183 ms 185 ms 182 ms ae-3.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.132.77]
14 * 189 ms * ae-78.ebr3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.135.14]
15 196 ms 196 ms 189 ms ae-2.ebr3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.132.9]
16 210 ms 195 ms 196 ms ae-73-73.csw2.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.69.134.230]
17 198 ms 199 ms 193 ms ae-21-79.car1.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.18.67]
18 183 ms 175 ms 181 ms 8.6.8.55

Trace complete.

WTF is going on after the DHCP server in Kingsport? This is the problem I have been having for nearly a month.

Any one else in Kingsport seeing this? I appreciate the work Isdnwolf has done, but this is getting extremely annoying.


volntn
The Volunteer
Premium
join:2002-01-05
Cleveland, TN
clubs:


1 edit
reply to GreatPumpkin
Only Charter and ISDNwolf knows the story. But just from you guys pings, It looks like its overcrowded or the circut isnt able to deliver its full capacity for whatever reason.

Here is a trace from Cleveland,thru kingsport to yahoo.

1, 192.168.1.1, 1ms,None,0%
2, 10.95.64.1, 14ms,None,0%
3, 71.80.70.62, 16ms,71-80-70-62.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com,0%
4, 24.159.64.49, 14ms,24-159-64-49.static.jcsn.tn.charter.com,0%
5, 64.200.71.13, 14ms,None,0%
6, 64.200.240.238, 20ms,None,0%
7, 64.200.249.37, 187ms,brvwil1wcx3-pos9-1-oc48.wcg.net,0%
8, 64.200.249.190, 29ms,None,0%
9, 4.68.110.37, 26ms,te-4-4-71.car2.Chicago1.Level3.net,0%
10, 4.68.101.62, 31ms,ae-32-52.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net,0%
11, 4.69.134.62, 28ms,ae-78.ebr3.Chicago1.Level3.net,0%
12, 4.69.132.70, 43ms,ae-2.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net,0%
13, 4.69.134.154, 47ms,ae-82-82.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net,0%
14, 4.68.17.131, 126ms,ae-31- 89.car1.Washington1.Level3.net,0%
15, 4.79.228.2, 50ms,None,0%
16, 216.115.108.17, 41ms,ge-2-1-0-p140.msr1.re1.yahoo.com,0%
17, 68.142.238.65, 40ms,gi1-22.bas-a1.re3.yahoo.com,0%
18, 69.147.114.210, 42ms,f1.www.vip.re3.yahoo.com,0%

Pitchy

join:2006-02-19
Kingsport, TN

Your 4th hop is going through a different server

4] 24.159.64.49, 14ms, 24-159-64-49.static.jcsn.tn.charter.com,0%

4] 110 ms 112 ms 133 ms 24-158-96-226.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.96.226]

BIG BIG DIFFERENCE! You got 14ms at the jcsn server, I hit the kgpt server at 100-250ms depending on the time of day.

I always have a great ping response at the dhcp server, but it's tat static one that is really kicking my ass.

ArkiMage

join:2001-06-30
Kingsport, TN

If you are seeing >30ms latency to a host that is still within Charter's local network, then obviously that has nothing to do with their pipe to the internet. A local problem on your end, your node, something else with their local or fiber/coax network, or possibly you're saturating your bandwidth at the time of the test.

Anyway, compare/contrast Charter Cable vs Embarq DSL at 8:30PM

Charter:
# traceroute 216.109.112.135
traceroute to 216.109.112.135 (216.109.112.135), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 10.164.0.1 (10.164.0.1) 9.984 ms 13.581 ms 17.123 ms
2 24-158-109-225.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com (24.158.109.225) 12.125 ms 18.569 ms 19.876 ms
3 24-158-96-226.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com (24.158.96.226) 26.541 ms 27.898 ms 34.535 ms
4 12.86.91.73 (12.86.91.73) 40.582 ms 45.923 ms 50.199 ms
5 tbr2.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.96.78) 75.082 ms 79.444 ms 84.092 ms
6 12.122.17.97 (12.122.17.97) 88.207 ms 87.737 ms 91.279 ms
7 cr2.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.1.174) 96.081 ms 40.056 ms 43.373 ms
8 12.122.16.14 (12.122.16.14) 47.241 ms 51.542 ms 55.784 ms
9 gar8.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.113.21) 75.952 ms 77.254 ms 78.831 ms
10 12.86.111.22 (12.86.111.22) 50.291 ms 54.146 ms 58.791 ms
11 ge-1-0-0-p120.msr1.dcn.yahoo.com (216.115.108.49) 62.255 ms 66.288 ms ge-0-0-0-p120.msr1.dcn.yahoo.com (216.115.108.9) 69.675 ms
12 ge2-2.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.142) 73.008 ms ge7-1.bas2-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.207) 85.011 ms 43.993 ms
13 * * *

Embarq DSL:
# traceroute 216.109.112.136
traceroute to 216.109.112.136 (216.109.112.136), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 router (192.168.100.1) 1.254 ms 2.285 ms 2.668 ms
2 tn-76-7-104-1.dhcp.embarqhsd.net (76.7.104.1) 12.250 ms * *
3 * * tn-76-5-159-237.sta.embarqhsd.net (76.5.159.237) 18.205 ms
4 sl-gw11-atl-6-0.sprintlink.net (144.223.131.9) 47.855 ms 31.892 ms 58.048 ms
5 sl-bb22-atl-5-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.12.85) 37.145 ms 60.835 ms 70.082 ms
6 sl-bb23-fw-13-0.sprintlink.net (144.232.8.67) 83.665 ms 37.203 ms 36.350 ms
7 * * *
8 tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net (12.123.16.14) 66.928 ms 87.542 ms 69.879 ms
9 tbr1.sl9mo.ip.att.net (12.122.10.89) 94.646 ms 85.336 ms 96.943 ms
10 tbr1.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.10.29) 116.264 ms 104.004 ms 77.860 ms
11 gar8.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.113.21) 60.536 ms 72.368 ms 60.404 ms
12 12.86.111.22 (12.86.111.22) 65.686 ms 60.587 ms 66.487 ms
13 ge-1-0-0-p120.msr1.dcn.yahoo.com (216.115.108.49) 69.192 ms ge-0-0-0-p120.msr1.dcn.yahoo.com (216.115.108.9) 62.896 ms ge-0-0-0-p130.msr2.dcn.yahoo.com (216.115.108.13) 70.827 ms
14 ge2-2.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.142) 61.896 ms ge7-1.bas2-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.207) 61.485 ms ge7-2.bas1-m.dcn.yahoo.com (216.109.120.201) 67.553 ms
15 * * *

Pitchy

join:2006-02-19
Kingsport, TN

Tracing route to google.com [72.14.207.99]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 22 ms 9 ms 32 ms 10.164.0.1
3 9 ms 7 ms 10 ms 24-158-109-225.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.109.225]
4 172 ms 160 ms 155 ms 24-158-96-226.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.96.226]
5 172 ms 173 ms 175 ms 12.86.91.73
6 186 ms 190 ms 189 ms tbr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.96.78]
7 192 ms 174 ms 173 ms ggr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.20.205]
8 160 ms 158 ms 170 ms 192.205.33.90
9 161 ms 164 ms 162 ms atl-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.21.101]
10 202 ms 185 ms 198 ms jfk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.5.10]
11 209 ms 190 ms 193 ms jfk-edge-20.inet.qwest.net [205.171.230.17]
12 199 ms 213 ms 205 ms 205.171.37.10
13 215 ms 224 ms 220 ms 72.14.233.113
14 207 ms 213 ms 210 ms 66.249.94.94
15 219 ms 217 ms 214 ms 72.14.236.134
16 197 ms 198 ms 193 ms eh-in-f99.google.com [72.14.207.99]

Trace complete.

Look at my 4th hop. If my first 3 hops are well within normal then somehow magically after 7pm the 4th hop skyrockets by 100ms or more, then how can that be on my end?

I hit my DHCP server in this tracert at 10ms and under... when it leaves the DHCP server to the STATIC server it goes from 10ms up to 172ms.

6pm or earlier I have great ping times to servers. Around 9pm is when it's the worst.

If this was limited to one PC then I would think of it as a specific problem... but I just booted up my laptop and hit 3 open unsecure WiFi networks in my apartment complex and a house behind me and what do you know... all 3 WiFi networks are showing the EXACT same scenario. So the problem is not isolated to me or my modem when I am seeing it on 4 different networks.

Tracerts on the 3 WiFi connections as well as my own all choke out at static.kgpt.tn.com.

However it is odd that your time is much much better at static.kgpt.tn.com than mine and my neighbors.

ArkiMage

join:2001-06-30
Kingsport, TN

I may have just tested it a bit early, I too see the 200ms+ times between those hops now.

That's not a "dhcp server" and "static server". Those are simply components of the reverse DNS names for those addresses. I'd also say they're not keeping that info all that up-to-date, the IP I have right now resolves as:

# host 24.159.42.xxx
xxx.42.159.24.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer 24-159-42-xxx.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com.

I don't have a static IP, power cycle the modem and I'll have a different one. Yet the IP I have right now has .static. in it's name. It would be nice if the *router* IPs they pipe traffic through had a reverse DNS name like oc48-att-atlanta.chartertn.net or something like that instead of a "cable modem" address, but they've probably got more important things to worry about...

So anyway, what's it look like the other way around, a trace from outside back towards my cable modem IP?

# traceroute 24.159.42.xxx
traceroute to 24.159.42.xxx (24.159.42.xxx), 30 hops max, 46 byte packets
1 router (216.184.67.xx) 0.573 ms 0.495 ms 0.489 ms
2 interconnect-86-153.bvunet.net (216.184.86.153) 0.375 ms 0.485 ms 0.536 ms
3 interconnect-86-33.bvunet.net (216.184.86.33) 2.152 ms 1.981 ms 2.019 ms
4 12.125.220.97 (12.125.220.97) 16.980 ms 17.248 ms 16.201 ms
5 tbr1.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.210) 21.054 ms 21.912 ms 21.897 ms
MPLS Label=31910 CoS=0 TTL=127 S=0
6 gar9.attga.ip.att.net (12.122.96.21) 20.609 ms 21.067 ms 20.920 ms
7 12.86.91.74 (12.86.91.74) 26.787 ms 27.337 ms 26.328 ms
8 24-158-96-225.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com (24.158.96.225) 127.577 ms 132.436 ms 136.268 ms
9 ts3srptritn.kgpt.tn.charter.com (24.158.109.226) 135.089 ms 129.852 ms 123.920 ms
10 * * *

It's hard to be certain not knowing more about their network topology but I'm going to guess this IP is the handoff point between Charter and AT&T. If so then they're still saturated, OC48 or not. Again though, it's hard to be certain peering in from the outside. Perhaps ISDNWOLF or others can give some insight to the network layout here.

Oh, and here's some info on the "DHCP server" on Charter's local network and a few other things... Gotten from serial port off the cable modem during acquisition.

Cable Modem IP Address = 10.164.5.xx
Cable Modem Subnet Mask = 255.255.192.0
Relay Agent IP Address = 10.164.0.1
TimeOffset = -18000
Time Server IP Address #1 = 68.114.38.197
Gateway IP Address #1 = 10.164.0.1
TFTP Server IP Address = 68.114.38.197
DHCP Server IP Address = 68.114.38.194
TFTP boot filename = {something}
IP address lease time = 604770 seconds
IP address lease time remaining = 604768 seconds
DHCP state => Address acquisition successful
Adding IP address to Cable port successful !
Adding IP address to Ethernet port successful !


volntn
The Volunteer
Premium
join:2002-01-05
Cleveland, TN
clubs:

reply to Pitchy
If this is only happening at night then you have been hit by the "oversold" bug. Nothing you can do but wait for them to add more bandwidth. 6-10pm is Internet prime time. If thats the only time its happening then they dont have enough bandwidth purchased. Hopefully it wont drag on for months like it did the last time. Around 2002/03

IsdnWolf
Premium
join:2002-05-24
Cleveland, TN
reply to ArkiMage
I am looking at it..

We are only at 50% capacity out to the Internet, but I see some other places where there is some congestion.

Let me see if there is a way to balance it out.

Pitchy

join:2006-02-19
Kingsport, TN

reply to volntn
The last one that hit me bad was Dec 05 - Mar 06. In 2002 I was lucky enough to be on Comcast

NOW!!! This is what I am used to seeing right here:
Tracing route to google.com [72.14.207.99]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms 10.164.0.1
3 7 ms 9 ms 7 ms 24-158-109-225.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.109.225]
4 11 ms 9 ms 9 ms 24-158-96-226.static.kgpt.tn.charter.com [24.158.96.226]
5 15 ms 24 ms 16 ms 12.86.91.73
6 16 ms 16 ms 17 ms tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.96.18]
7 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms ggr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.123.20.201]
8 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms 192.205.33.90
9 17 ms 21 ms 26 ms atl-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.21.101]
10 33 ms 33 ms 32 ms jfk-core-02.inet.qwest.net [67.14.5.10]
11 42 ms 38 ms 40 ms jfk-edge-20.inet.qwest.net [205.171.230.17]
12 38 ms 37 ms 38 ms 205.171.37.10
13 42 ms 46 ms 44 ms 72.14.233.115
14 44 ms 46 ms 54 ms 66.249.94.92
15 47 ms 49 ms 46 ms 72.14.236.130
16 48 ms 52 ms 55 ms eh-in-f99.google.com [72.14.207.99]

Trace complete.

But around 8-9pm you can tack on 100-200 to the majority of those hops.

Thanks Wolfman for looking into it... been driving me nuts for over a month and I had such high hopes that the OC-48 would have taken care of that... but alas it continues on.

Pitchy

join:2006-02-19
Kingsport, TN

reply to ArkiMage
quote:
That's not a "dhcp server" and "static server". Those are simply components of the reverse DNS names for those addresses. I'd also say they're not keeping that info all that up-to-date, the IP I have right now resolves as:

Arki...

Yeap, know those aren't DHCP and Static servers per-se. But it was easier to refer to them based on those names than typing out the IP or the full RDNS name.

I hate to say that I am glad you see the 200ms issue, but it is a relief that you do. I was baffled as to why you had a great response time at 'static' and mine was vastly higher than yours. Now it makes a lot more sense.

HighLonesome

join:2006-01-16
Johnson City, TN
reply to GreatPumpkin
This is really getting annoying
Every two years we have about 3 months to put up with the latency problems
I wish we had other options for cable providers!

Rick37725

join:2007-08-11

reply to GreatPumpkin
I live in Dandridge Tennessee. Last two months have been bad. Not only slow ping rates but modem likes to reboot.

Charter came out a week ago and said every thing is fine (right) but they said it must be the modem. They replaced the modem and still doing the same.

Any word (wolf) on when they will get to the bottom of this??

PS--I have never doen a QCR test--can some one fill me in?

Here is trace route to yahoo:

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Rick>tracert www.yahoo.com

Tracing route to www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [69.147.114.210]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1

Rick37725

join:2007-08-11

charter.txt 1,153 bytes
Will try attachment and paste then:
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Rick>tracert www.yahoo.com

Tracing route to www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [69.147.114.210]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1

Rick37725

join:2007-08-11
reply to GreatPumpkin
Well the attachment worked, not sure why the past did not.

Glad I stumbled upon this forum/thread. I see I am not alone in my misery!!
Forums » US Cable Support » Charter HSI/CATVA request to Charter Cable admin staff »
« Signal Levels  
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6


Friday, 04-Dec 16:49:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [123] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Long ethernet runs [Wireless Service Providers]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for ToC/ToGC (3.x) [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Dr. Tim Ball On the Significance of the CRU Hacked Documents [Canadian Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Nouveau DNS chez Google [Videotron]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· [ Professions] Northrend Herbalism and Mining Tracks [World of Warcraft]