<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Retaliation in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18756932</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:02:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:02:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Retaliation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18756932</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : The notice that was included in this month's faux-bill claims that opting out will in no way change your relationship with Comcast or the services they provide. Whether that's true (or if you get a little asterisk next to your name when Support brings up your account information) is anyone's guess.<br><SMALL>--<br>Anonymous posts are ignored. If you wish to be heard, speak for yourself.<br>Interested in <A HREF="http://www.enginuity.org/">open source engine management</A> for your Subaru?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18756932</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:45:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Retaliation</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18756727</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/834693"><b>LordMalak</b></A> : One can only wonder what the retaliation will be for those customers who opt out of the agreement... lower speeds, caps, heavy packet loss??<br><br>Maybe they're just better off dropping Comcast altogether.<br><br>EDIT: first post!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18756727</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:59:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
