benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
 ·Charter Pipeline
 ·Future Nine Corpor..
·Callcentric
 ·AT&T Midwest
| That doesn't sound very good.
I see Comcast continues to have issues. I'm worried because my parents live in an Insight Cable service area, and use Insight Cable Internet. I also know that Comcast purchased part of Insight not that long ago (including where my parents live), and they'll become Comcast customers pretty soon (at the end of the year, I think). I hope they don't suffer too badly. |
|
Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL
·Comcast
1 edit | It will be no different then it is now. It is only when getting in line with the other 750 Comcast customers (that is true if Carlyle sells to Comcast). As long as the service is good, no worries.
Personally I like Comcast's website better then Insights. |
|
xo
join:2007-06-15
Perry, FL | personnaly? |
|
Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL | There, is that better for you, since I corrected it? Sorry, but grammer is not one of my gripes when reading messages posted on a forum. |
|
sivran
Long Live The Suite
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to benc
If their cable is reliable now, then it will remain so when Comcast takes over fully. There may be problems for a while during and some time after the transition, but afterward things will return to normal. (in my experience)
I've had cable internet nigh 7 years now and been through @Home, AT&T, Comcast, and finally TWC/RR. The @Home to ATTBI and ATTBI to Comcast transitions went flawlessly, save for some brief downtime in the switch to Comcast. Comcast to TWC, not so much. There were persistent connectivity issues for weeks afterward, but all is smoothed out now.
Note that I'm only speaking of sheer uptime and ability to route here. By far AT&T was the worst service, dropping speeds from @Home's max of 5Mbps to 3, then to 1.5(!). Comcast was the best, improving both reliability and speed (up to 3, then 4). In fact, reliability has steadily improved save for some relatively brief troubles. I remember when a monthly 2+ hour outage was an expectation on @Home and later in the early days of AT&T.
Then again, maybe I'm just lucky. 
--
Think outside the fox...Seamonkey |
|
FiL
Premium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD | reply to Greg_Z
Rule #83- Don't ever back down to a grammer-nazi. It makes you less of a man... |
|
Greg_Z
Premium
join:2001-08-08
Springfield, IL | I was actually being Snarky without getting dinged. |
|
jamez818
please hold during the silence
join:2000-09-18
Sunland, CA
·EarthLink
| reply to sivran
I guess you are lucky. Look at what happen in Los Angeles when Timewarner took over. I believe there is a class action lawsuit now pending. Personally I had a few hours here and there with no TV service but nothing major, knock on wood.
--
just whiners and complainers... |
|
lordjim
Premium
join:2004-03-26
Deerfield, IL
| reply to sivran
You're just lucky, I think. I also went from @Home, to AT&T, to Comcast ... and when @Home went belly up I lost service for a week (and several mbits/sec of bandwidth: I had 4 mbit symmetric under @Home ... when AT&T was finished with me I had 1.5 mbits down and 25 kbits up) and suffered a rate hike. The transition to Comcast also involved several days of downtime too, and another substantial price increase. I've had continual increases since then. I'm still not getting what I had under @Home to this very day, and I'm paying double for it.
The U.S. broadband industry is just pathetic. |
|
