<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Broadband costs in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18775207</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:46:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:46:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18788258</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1441954"><b>tamovies</b></A> : <br>I pay $7.75]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18788258</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:00:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18784901</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/129458"><b>KrK</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  en102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID.</DIV>I think it's more like $8.50 or $9.00]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18784901</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:48:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : Nice to know that .30/message is well earned by AT&T.  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777563</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:04:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637997"><b>macmouse</b></A> : yeah. that is why you can send/recieve a text message when the system is overloaded (and all of voice channels are in use).<br><br>For that matter, It costs them (the company) /more/ to handle voice (or even inet) connections from a technical standpoint. and  yet you pay *extra* for it in the US (vs free in europe, japan,etc). I can't come up with any logical reasons on why they are doing it this way...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777534</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:58:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777443</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : Holy smokes...so it's just 'free money' to the provider.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777443</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:46:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777409</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/637997"><b>macmouse</b></A> : the reason there is the 160 character limit for SMS (over CDMA network - it is like 140 with GSM) is because that is the size of the data payload for a /single/ data frame for the protocol.<br><br>every second or so (whatever the timing is), your cell phone sends a "im still here" signal, which is a standard packet with the appropiate headers with a empty payload. So, when you send a SMS, data is entered into that status update packet that is routinely sent out (and why there is a slight delay before it is sent out, because it is waiting for its turn).<br><br>Thus, in effect it costs the company nothing in airtime cost because that air time would be intentionally left empty anyway (and a tiny fraction of a cent in data network costs).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18777409</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:40:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775760</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/747017"><b>Anonuser</b></A> : Interesting. I have following for $30/month.<br>500 anytime<br>unlimited nights and weekends at 7pm<br>unlimited pcs powervision+picture mail<br>unlimited roaming<br>unlimited texting in and out (non international)<br>unlimited sprint to sprint.<br><br>Got the above, no harassing retentions. I called up to renew my SERO contract, and the lady said, as long as I was on the phone, would I like unlimited text messaging and nights starting at 7 for no additional charge? I of course said yes :)<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.WiiNetCommunity.com" >www.WiiNetCommunity.com</A> FREE RELIABLE WEB HOSTING!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775760</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:36:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775396</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : Don't like it/don't use it is a different issue from whether or not it's a cash cow.  I use SMS all the time for per personal and business so I use a prepaid option but it doesn't change the fact that AT&T is making a mint on it.<br>  <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.mugsie.org/">Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775396</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:42:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775391</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/162762"><b>djrobx</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>EXACTLY!  I have an unlimited data plan.  Texting is crude joke compared to the phone's data capabilities.  Getting charged for INCOMING texts is insulting / double dipping.<br><br>Competition seems to be slowly working to improve the situation, though.  An extra $5/month now gets me unlimited M2M texts (over the 200 included with the $19.95 data/text plan).  It's still highway robbery for what it is, but at least I don't have to cringe when I get an incoming spam text.<br><SMALL>--<br>Laser eye surgery rocks!  I love frickin' laser beams.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775391</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:40:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ColorBASIC <A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Yeah, and they're charging up to .30 per message.  You want to claim that SMS isn't high margin?<br> </DIV>Yes, it is high. Don't like the price, then don't use it. I have SMS blocked on my cellphone inbound and outbound.<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775334</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:31:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775309</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Hell ya its high (this stuff, and forced signing of these kind of plans for discounts on devices) ticks me off.  I've actually put a block on all SMS/MMS/Text on my phone.  Email is much cheaper than MMS/SMS for the consumer.<br><br>On another note:  I USED to have SMS/MMS when I was with the original AT&T Wireless - they offered unlimited FREE inbound messaging (SMS/MMS/txt email).  I somehow don't think that the cost of this service has increased.<br><br>This is similar to AT&T charging $5/month for caller ID.<br><SMALL>--<br>Canada = Hollywood North</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775309</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:27:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775263</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/356174"><b>tiger72</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>And the method of calculating cost by "Mobile Jones" is, as usual, bogus. The cost to the cell provider isn't on how many bytes are transmitted. The cost is based on use of a channel(from a limited number of channels) on the cell tower and how long it takes to grab the wireless spectrum, establish the connection, and then transmit, and then take down the connection. Every time someone sends a 20 byte message, all those costs are incurred and they far exceed the costs of some theoretical bandwidth usage. And then every time a new message is sent(20 secs later for example), the whole process starts all over again. <br> </DIV>My my my! So costly! It's a downright miracle that people can make telephone calls with their cell phones!<br><br>practically instantaneous sending of a 20Byte message takes mere seconds, and doesn't hog the channel like talking does, yet talking on a cell phone is now bargain-bin stuff.<br><br>hrrrmmm....<br><SMALL>--<br><I><B>|- The LP &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml" >www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml</A> -|<BR>|- </I>Cato @ Liberty <I>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org" >www.cato-at-liberty.org</A> -|</I></B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775263</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:21:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : Yeah, and they're charging up to .30 per message.  You want to claim that SMS isn't high margin?<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.mugsie.org/">Macintosh Users Group Serving the Inland Empire</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775221</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:13:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : And the method of calculating cost by "Mobile Jones" is, as usual, bogus. The cost to the cell provider isn't on how many bytes are transmitted. The cost is based on use of a channel(from a limited number of channels) on the cell tower and how long it takes to grab the wireless spectrum, establish the connection, and then transmit, and then take down the connection. Every time someone sends a 20 byte message, all those costs are incurred and they far exceed the costs of some theoretical bandwidth usage. And then every time a new message is sent(20 secs later for example), the whole process starts all over again. <br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775207</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:12:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775153</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : The point of the article is that it doesn't cost where SMS is concerned.  The wireless providers are gouging customers big time, to the tune of $1,000.00 per MB.  While I can understand that processing 6500 messages costs money even the biggest telco shill would acknowledge that processing the messages at .15-.30 each (since they charge both outgoing AND incoming) is a very high margin operation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775153</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:01:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Broadband costs</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775146</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1451268"><b>telcolackey</b></A> : And people keep complaining about speed and costs associated with broadband.  Do the same math on that service and compare it with wireless and dedicated circuits.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18775146</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:00:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>SMS, number port fee, etc, all cash cows</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18774996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426384"><b>ColorBASIC</b></A> : Much like every other add-on, texting is a total cash cow for wireless providers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18774996</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:32:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
