Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West » pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[General] Any compelling reason to stay with SBC vs DSL extreme? »
« lost copper pair  

mers2
Premium,MVM
join:2004-03-20
USA
clubs:

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

Thanks. Also interesting as ATT made it sound like mail would be inaccessible without going through SSL.
--
Team Discovery
Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

I just switched to ATT from another ISP a couple of weeks ago and I thought the same about using SSL. I have never used SSL before for email (I use it with my newsserver though) even during a previous stint using PacBell. As you said, they only give the information for using SSL which gives the impression that SSL is the only way email will work. I am now wondering why they want us to use SSL? Not that I am the suspicious type but ATT doesn't have a good reputation for customer support and service.

Eeyore

d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

You need SSL email for security when you are traveling and accessing your email account across a networked owned by some other provider. This conversion to SSL email access goes hand-in-hand with the new free wifi access and their iPhone sales which can use wifi connections. Frankly, AT&T should have had SSL email access when they first offered wifi, but better late than never.

If you only access your email from your home DSL connection, then you really don't need the SSL protection.
bwclark

join:2004-07-05
Eureka, CA

Thanks!

Getting rid of SSL does improve the email!

Thanks to all who reported.
ELRefugee

join:2002-02-07
Scotts Valley, CA
·Comcast

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

said by d_l See Profile :

If you only access your email from your home DSL connection, then you really don't need the SSL protection.
How sure are you about this? I'd like to turn off SSL but don't want to run into nasty problems (i.e. not being able to receive or send email, and not being aware of it for days or weeks).

d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

I don't have any inside knowledge about when or if Yahoo plans to discontinue the old 25/110 servers. They work now, but might not in the future.

Some people have just switched back to the old servers when these email problems started and the email works on the old servers, but there are also reports here at DSLR that indicate that the old servers are also having their share of access problems so this isn't something restricted to the new servers.
Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

As I indicated earlier I couldn't even get onto the SSL server at all. So switching to the old (non-SSL) servers have at least gotten me on. I will wait to hear if/when the SSL server is back on line and also try the SSL settings every once in a while to see if they are up again. It would really be nice if ATT could let us know (not by email!) when the problem has been fixed. Tech support can't help. I once played with them for four days of no connection to the internet only to find that the whole area had been out; but tech support didn't know about it. And I don't know of any "status page" that would let me know about problems. The only one I found says that email is working normally. So it is up to the individual to fight his own battles.

Eeyore

d_l
Barsoom
Premium,MVM
join:2002-12-08
Reno, NV

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

I suspect that these problems are caused by Yahoo and not AT&T. Of course, AT&T is responsible because they chose Yahoo as a partner to manage the email service and apparently renewed the partnership this past spring.
Eeyore69

join:2005-02-26
Oceanside, CA

Re: pop.att.yahoo.com Mail sloooooooow

For anyone that cares my SSL email is up again. And it seems like it is working more quickly than it did before it went down. Perhaps ATT/Yahoo has fixed the problem.

Eeyore
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T West[General] Any compelling reason to stay with SBC vs DSL extreme? »
« lost copper pair  


Friday, 04-Dec 11:00:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [144] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [110] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [92] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [72] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [70] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]