<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>This is why they need the Resident&#x27;s Support in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18809187</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:53:59 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:53:59 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: This is why they need the Resident&#x27;s Support</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18812755</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1128460"><b>kimocrossman</b></A> : your comments on the $750k are for another ballot measure - not the Wi-Fi initiative.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18812755</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 02:23:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>This is why they need the Resident&#x27;s Support</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18809187</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/638243"><b>nightdesigns</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>The measure would set aside up to $750,000 of city money - to be used as matching funds to private contributions - to renovate and maintain the stables.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>While it may be free, it is costing tax payer's dollars not just in the $750,000 but in quite a bit of time it requires for city staff to put together RFPs, RFQ's, and general research.<br><br>It appears that, for once, a city wants their resident's input before they move forward with the project.<br><SMALL>--<br>[[Your signature here]]</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18809187</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 13:02:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
