Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18811424 en Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:57:49 EDT Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:57:49 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18811424 Ahrenl : Google is pretty smart about their ad business. I'd be shocked if they tried the audible ads method. Many a focus group would find that VERY displeasing. Ads will be displayed on the screen, and they will be able to target them geographically. So if a store nearby is running a sale, an ad will occupy the top banner of your phone telling you there's a store nearby with a sale going on. If ads are annoying they can have negative effects, which the people paying for them know, and google knows as well. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18811424 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 21:14:32 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18810071 Tzale :
said by LuisRodg See Profile :

As much as ads on a cell phone sounds unpleasing, I'd take it anyday from shelling out $50 per month. But then again you may have another income than me. I am a soon-to-be college student working a part-time and income is limited.
I agree 100%...

Google is God if they do this.

-Tzale]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18810071 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 16:18:16 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18809027 eco : Based on Google's request that the new spectrum allow devices that can be loaded with any applications the consumer wants to add, and that the same will be true with a Google phone, I would say we can reasonably expect to see and AdMuncher/AdBlock show up.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18809027 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:17:15 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808878 sivran : See TCH's above quote from the article. You're exactly the target market. :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808878 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:46:43 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808593 LuisRodg : As much as ads on a cell phone sounds unpleasing, I'd take it anyday from shelling out $50 per month. But then again you may have another income than me. I am a soon-to-be college student working a part-time and income is limited.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808593 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:51:19 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808567 rbrugman : I'd much rather fork out $50 per month for an ad-free cell plan than have ads on my cell phone. If they just displayed on the screen it would be fine, but I imagine they will be audiable as well, such as before (or even during!) a call.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808567 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:45:04 EDT Re: Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808467 dadkins :
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

The octopus that is Google is sending its tentacles in to another field. Can we get an adblock add-on from Mozilla for the gPhone?? :D

I was just going to post asking about AdMuncher Mobile! LOL! :D
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808467 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:16:30 EDT Ads on my cellphone - no thanks http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808435 TKJunkMail : The octopus that is Google is sending its tentacles in to another field. Can we get an adblock add-on from Mozilla for the gPhone?? :D

»www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co···884.html
"The average adult who can afford a cell phone is not going to want to listen to ads. So this is mainly for teenagers, twenty-somethings, high schoolers or people who can't afford a phone," said Kagan.

--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18808435 Sat, 04 Aug 2007 10:07:54 EDT