site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
87
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

another reason it's not a substitute

just another reason satellite is no substitute for wired broadband and shouldn't even be counted - it's a niche solution for people that are SOL for a wired internet connection and that's all it will ever be.

If "broadband" ever changes from the ludicrous FCC definition of 200kbps, satellite won't even be considered broadband.


hdman
Flt Rider
Premium
join:2003-11-25
Appleton, WI
Reviews:
·exede by ViaSat

said by nasadude:

If "broadband" ever changes from the ludicrous FCC definition of 200kbps, satellite won't even be considered broadband.
No doubt. I have WB now and have had it for over 2 years. It beats the CRAP out of dial up, but would I even try to compare it to my T1's at the office, cable or DSL? No way. Comparing it in that fashion, I would agree that Sat. based access is certainly NOT broadband....

HDMan

Monday, 28-May 22:37:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics