<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Interesting idea in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18829212</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:46:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:46:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18830110</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : I have experienced this firsthand. If I am not mistaken, each "hop" without an internet connection halves the available throughput. After the third or forth "hop" this system will be slowed to a dial up crawl. The self configuration of the units does seem pretty cool however, and it certainly would make setting up small networks easier for those less technically inclined. <br><SMALL>--<br><B>&#1103; &#1083;&#1102;&#1073;&#1083;&#1102; &#1044;&#1077;&#1085;&#1076;&#1080;!</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18830110</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:51:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829838</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/600373"><b>KSC519</b></A> : The meraki units work extremely well for their intended use: Cheap, straightforward internet access. They aren't designed to replace private wifi networks, in this arena they rate rather poorly. I purchased a few of these a couple of months ago and I've had very few issues. Limit the hops to 3-4 between gateways and you're sailing smooth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829838</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:12:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Ancalagon <A HREF="/useremail/u/1464928"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>If it works, great...but I can't imagine there wouldn't be significant signal degradation from daisy-chaining a bunch of wireless routers/repeaters.<br> </DIV>Actually, the term you are looking for is "throughput" rather than "signal" degradation.<br><br>But yes, that is true. This effect is well-known with mesh systems, especially those that use a single frequency.<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829313</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:51:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829212</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1464928"><b>Ancalagon</b></A> : If it works, great...but I can't imagine there wouldn't be significant signal degradation from daisy-chaining a bunch of wireless routers/repeaters.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829212</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:34:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
