Re: ! - dslreports.com

Author	All Replies
averagedude join:2002-01-30 Mesa, AZ	reply to Michieru2 Re: ! I was thinking something similar. Without ISP protections, that would mean you (as an individual) would be required to keep records of all use for the department of homeland security, and provide a back door for them.
averagedude join:2002-01-30 Mesa, AZ	to forum · permalink · · 2007-08-07 19:19:39 ·
DaneJasper Sonic.Net Premium,VIP join:2001-08-20 Santa Rosa, CA clubs:	said by averagedude : I was thinking something similar. Without ISP protections, that would mean you (as an individual) would be required to keep records of all use for the department of homeland security, and provide a back door for them. If your ISP knew you were running a Meraki - in fact, if they sold it to you - they would know that use from that IP might not be you. They could, in fact, determine what MAC address was connected at the time the subpoena states. They could NOT give the law enforcement YOUR info, but instead whatever info they had on the person who used the Meraki. Hmm - wonder if any ISPs are headed in this direction... -Dane
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-08-08 04:57:21 ·


Monday, 09-Nov 23:25:06	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF