<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: ! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18829584</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:20:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:20:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18831362</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/456408"><b>DaneJasper</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  averagedude <A HREF="/useremail/u/574887"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I was thinking something similar.<br><br>Without ISP protections, that would mean you (as an individual) would be required to keep records of all use for the department of homeland security, and provide a back door for them.<br> </DIV>If your ISP knew you were running a Meraki - in fact, if they sold it to you - they would know that use from that IP might not be you.  They could, in fact, determine what MAC address was connected at the time the subpoena states.  They could NOT give the law enforcement YOUR info, but instead whatever info they had on the person who used the Meraki.<br><br>Hmm - wonder if any ISPs are headed in this direction...  ;)<br><br>-Dane]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18831362</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:57:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1226337"><b>hayabusa3303</b></A> : You could use opendns and block adult websites. <br><br>For blocking that stuff i dont know if you can you should.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829584</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:30:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: !</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/574887"><b>averagedude</b></A> : I was thinking something similar.<br><br>Without ISP protections, that would mean you (as an individual) would be required to keep records of all use for the department of homeland security, and provide a back door for them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829513</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:19:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829366</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1148403"><b>Michieru2</b></A> : I can already see the feds breaking down your door for downloading kiddie porn because you where acting as a router to the mesh network.<br><br>Your excuse?<br><br>But but! I am on a public mesh network!<br><br>Yeah Yeah! Sure you are you pedophile.<br><SMALL>--<br>Duct tape, saving lives since 1942.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18829366</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:57:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
