<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Interesting idea&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18829212</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:28:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:28:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18830110</link>
<description><![CDATA[wifi4milez posted : I have experienced this firsthand. If I am not mistaken, each "hop" without an internet connection halves the available throughput. After the third or forth "hop" this system will be slowed to a dial up crawl. The self configuration of the units does seem pretty cool however, and it certainly would make setting up small networks easier for those less technically inclined. <br><SMALL>--<br><B>&#1103; &#1083;&#1102;&#1073;&#1083;&#1102; &#1044;&#1077;&#1085;&#1076;&#1080;!</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18830110</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:51:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18829838</link>
<description><![CDATA[KSC5190 posted : The meraki units work extremely well for their intended use: Cheap, straightforward internet access. They aren't designed to replace private wifi networks, in this arena they rate rather poorly. I purchased a few of these a couple of months ago and I've had very few issues. Limit the hops to 3-4 between gateways and you're sailing smooth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18829838</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:12:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18829313</link>
<description><![CDATA[John Galt posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1464928" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1464928');">Ancalagon</a>:</SMALL><br><br>If it works, great...but I can't imagine there wouldn't be significant signal degradation from daisy-chaining a bunch of wireless routers/repeaters.<br> </DIV>Actually, the term you are looking for is "throughput" rather than "signal" degradation.<br><br>But yes, that is true. This effect is well-known with mesh systems, especially those that use a single frequency.<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Interesting-idea-18829313</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:51:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Interesting idea</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Interesting-idea-18829212</link>
<description><![CDATA[Ancalagon posted : If it works, great...but I can't imagine there wouldn't be significant signal degradation from daisy-chaining a bunch of wireless routers/repeaters.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Interesting-idea-18829212</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:34:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

