dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
uniqs
4
« So...Hmm.. »
This is a sub-selection from !

DaneJasper
Sonic.Net
Premium Member
join:2001-08-20
Santa Rosa, CA

DaneJasper to averagedude

Premium Member

to averagedude

Re: !

said by averagedude:

I was thinking something similar.

Without ISP protections, that would mean you (as an individual) would be required to keep records of all use for the department of homeland security, and provide a back door for them.
If your ISP knew you were running a Meraki - in fact, if they sold it to you - they would know that use from that IP might not be you. They could, in fact, determine what MAC address was connected at the time the subpoena states. They could NOT give the law enforcement YOUR info, but instead whatever info they had on the person who used the Meraki.

Hmm - wonder if any ISPs are headed in this direction...

-Dane
« So...Hmm.. »
This is a sub-selection from !