republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Can Spam Failure » Why would anyone here be surprised?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
A government program failed?! I'm SHOCKED! »
« US bureacracy at work! I mean recess...  
AuthorAll Replies

clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: Why would anyone here be surprised?

I don't agree with your comments, but I agree with a portion of your premise. Indeed, it's time that the internet community respond to a problem created by technology with a technological solution.

Seems to me that it would be a rather easy to implement something to permit the recipient to verify the identity of the sender. By giving levels of trust, it could be easy to filter mail appropriately either by the end reader or at the final MTA, whichever the recipient so desires. Once someone reports a breach of trust with a sender's credentials, that information can be stored to assist others.

Of course, does Postini, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and a handful of large ISPs really want this problem solved? Effective spam filtering is either a money maker or a marketing point for these people, and solving the problem affects their bottom line.


pog
Premium
join:2004-06-03
Kihei, HI
·Hawaiian Telcom

said by clickie See Profile :

Seems to me that it would be a rather easy to implement something to permit the recipient to verify the identity of the sender.
Seems to me you need to read up on things a bit.

Such systems already exist and have for many years... all have flaws, some very serious, that make them universally unadoptable. The basic fact is that email was originally built around trust and good faith... so any attempt to secure it is going to involve a kludge.

There is no magic bullet... all solutions have varying levels of collateral damage and/or ineffectiveness.
--
My Site

clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

Seems to me you're making the assumption that I don't know about SPF or domainkeys, et al. They fail because they try to stop spam within the MTA and don't give enough control the recipient to determine the level of trust they're willing to accept. All that remains is the way you determine trust; X.509 certificates or various signature schemes.

The MTA is built around trust, but that doesn't mean the client has to impart the same trust. Using multipart MIME formatting makes it compatible with existing mail systems, and isn't any more of a kludge than HTML/rich text formatting.
Forums » The Can Spam FailureA government program failed?! I'm SHOCKED! »
« US bureacracy at work! I mean recess...  


Friday, 04-Dec 14:30:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [118] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [78] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Docsis, DSL technology [Canadian Broadband]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· People would bewalking away from the table if ACTA public [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]