<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>How about the reverse? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18837008</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:59:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:59:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: How about the reverse?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18837451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1187222"><b>King Duck</b></A> : It's a tad difficult to verify as I have never met anyone prepared to admit to being undercharged...<br><br> :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18837451</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 22:57:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>How about the reverse?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18837008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/285788"><b>n2jtx</b></A> : Is anybody getting charged less than they were supposed to?  No, I didn't think so.  Just like errors with the scanners at the supermarket are usually in the stores favor, not the customer.<br><SMALL>--<br>I support the right to keep and arm bears.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18837008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:55:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
