site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
146
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

NightHawke

join:2002-02-28
Rockport, TX
Reviews:
·Stelera Wireless

about time...

About time a state applied the pliers to VZ's balls. I love to see those execs squirm and whimper while their spin doctors whirl away like a ballerina in front of a shotgun.

I'd like to see Texas put the squeeze on at&t here locally. They are dropping the ball on DSL coverage, not to mention some QOS issues.


Ted

@rr.com

said by NightHawke:

About time a state applied the pliers to VZ's balls. I love to see those execs squirm and whimper while their spin doctors whirl away like a ballerina in front of a shotgun.

I'd like to see Texas put the squeeze on at&t here locally. They are dropping the ball on DSL coverage, not to mention some QOS issues.
At least AT&T in its U-Verse deployment isn't ignoring its existing infrastructure. U-Verse may be neutered, but the technology is irrelevant-- You cannot deploy a new technology, be it FTTH or FTTC, and ignore the more prolific existing infrastructure. If you have to ignore the existing infrastructure to focus on the new deployment, you should probably re-evaluate deployment options so you don't screw your loyal EXISTING customers.

Let's be honest, Verizon has the resources to balance its fios deployment and existing plant maintenance. The simple fact that the executives are throughly imbibed with greed and see maintaining existing infrastructure as throwing money away. God bless their customers on copper who don't have fios as an option to replace it

Tuesday, 29-May 02:35:33 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics