<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: sigh in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18840593</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:39:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:39:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917340"><b>Geminimind</b></A> : yep dedicated line and way better sound quality not to mention the backup battery]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1099325"><b>Ahrenl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  odreian615 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1315394"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Isn't that Anti net-neutrality<br> </DIV>Depending on which definition you have of net neutrality. <br><br>If they allow other VOIP services to use the dedicated bandwidth for no additional fee to the company, then it's not. That's probably not what they're doing. Hence why they can charge more for a "better service". The incumbant plan will be to rinse and repeat this for all internet services so they can capture the revenue for all their "better services". When in fact the service is exactly the same/or worse.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840593</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:20:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840434</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269277"><b>Ebolla</b></A> : it doesnt impact upload or download of user as its on a diff. portion of bandwidth used by emta so I would think net-neutrality wouldnt apply.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840434</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1315394"><b>odreian615</b></A> : Isn't that Anti net-neutrality]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840380</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 12:38:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840026</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/686740"><b>Defiance82</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  lettcco <A HREF="/useremail/u/908074"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> :( it's a sad day when comcrap comes out ahead of incumbent VOIP provider EVEN when they are charging more for the same service.<br> </DIV>It's not the same service... Comcast VoIP is actually better than Vonage in our area. Not to mention it's a dedicated line unlike Vonage, and has VoIP priority unlike Vonage. No more muffled voices or dropped calls when uploading either :)<br><SMALL>--<br>Programming is like sex. One mistake - endless support.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18840026</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 11:48:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18839701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1310911"><b>HyPeRbAnD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  lettcco <A HREF="/useremail/u/908074"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> EVEN when they are charging more for the same service.<br> </DIV>It's not the same service. Almost!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18839701</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:44:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>sigh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18839652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/908074"><b>lettcco</b></A> :  :( it's a sad day when comcrap comes out ahead of incumbent VOIP provider EVEN when they are charging more for the same service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18839652</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 10:36:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
