said by Asmodeus:if the federal government asked at&t to censor pearl jams speech, then they would be liable for committing an unconstitutional act as an agent of the government... however, the allegation is that pearl jam had their speech censored by a corporate entity working unto itself to control it's content... that is suppression of speech, not censorship of speech.
Censorship is not unconstitutional. The government practicing censorship is unconstitutional. Corporations and individuals are free to commit censorship as they see damn well please.
