| Qwest wow Qwest is big |
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2 | u know qwest was AT$T |
|
|
|
1 edit | reply to ok597
said by ok597 :
wow Qwest is big
Big geographically. But in population covered they are smaller than the other telcos. Verizon has much less territory, but more population in the N.E. Corridor.
With a lower density population, Qwest's cost per user are higher than the other telcos.
Qwest 15 million landlines
Verizon 30 million landlines
AT&T 32 million landlines
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
 djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1 | reply to ok597
That map is misleading. It makes it appear as though Qwest is the only phone company in say, Washington, or that AT&T is the only phone company in California, when Verizon has territories in both places!
|
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to ok597
said by ok597 :
wow Qwest is big
LOL. see how much of the country ISN'T going to be getting fios.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to Anonymous_
Qwest[qworst] once was US West[US worst] which was A T & T.
All the phone companies were at one time ATT.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
 sapoCruising Down Memory LanePremium
join:2002-09-16
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 | reply to djrobx
yeah... i personally have Frontier, while my friend 10 minutes away has AT&T, my friend near LA has Verizon and my friend in the north area of Sac has Surewest. Big headache. |
|
| reply to dvd536
Actually, no, not all phone companies were part of AT&T. There are still many independent phone companies, some as small as a few hundred lines. |
|
