<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;RE: Microsoft Defends White Space Devices&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RE-Microsoft-Defends-White-Space-Devices-18869377</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:53:13 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:53:13 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: RE: Microsoft Defends White Space Devices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RE-Microsoft-Defends-White-Space-Devices-18871408</link>
<description><![CDATA[PDXPLT posted : Hmmm... this physics major has no idea what "laws" you're talking about.<br><br>It's alot easier to detect the presense of a signal (especially the ATSC pilot tone) than it is to receive one well enough to demodulate it and obtain the video content.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-RE-Microsoft-Defends-White-Space-Devices-18871408</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:54:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>RE: Microsoft Defends White Space Devices</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RE-Microsoft-Defends-White-Space-Devices-18869377</link>
<description><![CDATA[Sammer posted : Why is anybody surprised that the laws of physics can't be broken? There is no way to make such a device that won't interfere with someone's reception. Just because the device thinks your television can't receive a certain channel doesn't mean your set can't.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/RE-Microsoft-Defends-White-Space-Devices-18869377</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:44:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

