<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Qwest&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866496</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:47:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18878978</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Actually, no, not all phone companies were part of AT&T. There are still many independent phone companies, some as small as a few hundred lines.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18878978</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:14:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18869098</link>
<description><![CDATA[sapo posted : yeah... i personally have Frontier, while my friend 10 minutes away has AT&T, my friend near LA has Verizon and my friend in the north area of Sac has Surewest. Big headache.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18869098</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 23:49:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18867981</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1027919" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1027919');">Anonymous_</a>:</SMALL><br><br>u know qwest was AT$T<br> </DIV>Qwest[qworst] once was US West[US worst] which was A T & T.<br>All the phone companies were at one time ATT.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18867981</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:01:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18867940</link>
<description><![CDATA[dvd536 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by ok597 :</SMALL><br><br>wow Qwest is big<br> </DIV>LOL. see how much of the country ISN'T going to be getting fios.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18867940</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:56:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866665</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : That map is misleading.  It makes it appear as though Qwest is the only phone company in say, Washington, or that AT&T is the only phone company in California, when Verizon has territories in both places! <br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866665</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:48:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866610</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by ok597 :</SMALL><br><br>wow Qwest is big<br> </DIV>Big geographically. But in population covered they are smaller than the other telcos. Verizon has much less territory, but more population in the N.E. Corridor.<br><br>With a lower density population, Qwest's cost per user are higher than the other telcos.<br><br>Qwest 15 million landlines<br>Verizon 30 million landlines<br>AT&T 32 million landlines<br><br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866610</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:42:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866563</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anonymous_ posted : u know qwest was AT$T]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Qwest-18866563</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:35:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Qwest</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Qwest-18866496</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : wow Qwest is big]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Qwest-18866496</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 17:24:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

