Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Coming Cable Capacity Apocalypse! » Why upgrade when you can throttle.
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
80 Billion Fiasco that we the customer end up paying. »
« What the hell?  
AuthorAll Replies

tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Floral Park, NY

reply to Warez_Zealot
Re: What do people realistically want?

said by Warez_Zealot See Profile :

said by telcolackey See Profile :

1) Faster
2) Cheaper
3) Unlimited usage

Pick only 2 options

Bandwidth usage at peak times cost $$... That is why all commercial ISPs moved from flat rate to 95%ile usage based billing years ago. As speeds get higher, a small set of customers will throw off the cost models
Well I don't buy that.. I've never seen the #'s in financial reports showing actual bw costs.. Most ISP's have peering agreements too.

IMO the throttling is done mostly due to capacities. It's cheaper for them to stop your P2P uploads than to upgrade for congestion.

I would rather have the faster upload speeds, but what's the point if you cant use it..

The funny thing is, when ISP's throttle, they typically throttle to 0kB/s or 5-10kB/s. That is a little excessive.. If anything, they should configure the throttling program to throttle more as more people are online, and less during off hours..
The only method of customer feedback cable companies understand is to cancel service and go with any competitor available.. How do you think Verizon FIOS gets to 1+ Million installed customer base? Happy telco talk? NO! From companies such as cablevision throttling their connections and pissing off customers.. Now many of those people are relatively happy Verizon FIOS customers. $29.95 Lures will not work if the service SUCKS. Conversely.. the shoe can as easily go on the other foot for Verizon's BILLING fiasco's that they like to play games at...
Eventually, they'll calculate their losses to the competition and see if it's worth upgrading the network capacity and giving customers MORE for LESS.. For the time being, that answer is NO (with limited exceptions).
Forums » The Coming Cable Capacity Apocalypse!80 Billion Fiasco that we the customer end up paying. »
« What the hell?  


Saturday, 05-Dec 00:17:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [78] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· ToC 4th boss - Preliminary Strategy for Twin Valkyr [World of Warcraft]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]