<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Interference Concerns in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18885547</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:34:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:34:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Interference Concerns</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18885547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/288700"><b>tomp0624</b></A> : Agree.....No BPL.  It does interfere with HAM Radio and I am 36. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18885547</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Interference Concerns</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18878332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/175176"><b>mb</b></A> : If Ed Hare is OK with it, then I will not dump my DirecTV service now. If they cause 'polution' to spectrum used for point to point RF communications, I'll dump them like a hot potatoe. I am an ARRL member and licensed amateur radio operator that understands the valuable natural resource that BPL and private greed could destroy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18878332</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:09:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
