http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18887945 en Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:06:08 EDT Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:06:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18887945 cmaenginsb : And how did they present their proposal and where in the FCC rules does it require a time frame for them to act? The FCC generally moves pretty slow, having seen the amount of time it's taken for them to make changes in the unlicensed band a year isn't an unacceptable time to consider something especially depending on how it was first presented to them.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18887945 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:23:23 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18886437 chemaupr : Is not, they presnted their proposal over a year ago. By the same rules the FCC established, they should have responded by know.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18886437 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:47:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18886223 cmaenginsb : The normal process for the FCC making any policy decision is to go through the "lengthy rulemaking" so that everyone's interest is represented, not just what one company wants. Every major decision the FCC makes (and this would be a major one) goes through this process. If the FCC skipped this process in creating a new policy in the incumbents favor people would be all over them, why should it be any different for these morons?
--
CCNA, Comtrain Certified Tower Climber]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18886223 Thu, 16 Aug 2007 11:17:04 EDT