<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>bit torrent and fios in Verizon Fiber Optics</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18890342</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:45:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:45:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: bit torrent and fios</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1429543"><b>noping</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  blue_trooper <A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>This isn't Verizon regulating things but could be an issue if you are seeding a large number of popular torrents.</DIV>The popular conspiracy theory is that Verizon purposely crippled the firmware on the Actiontec to limit P2P on their network and/or that they're slow to issue a fix for it because of the aforementioned reason. I don't buy into that theory at all.<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BryanOnRR <A HREF="/useremail/u/1465816"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>only on dsl would have a limit</DIV>Even on DSL, I don't think they implement traffic shaping. I have a friend that lives across town that still has DSL - routinely downloads from BT, Usenet and Winny without any problems at high speeds.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891296</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:38:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: bit torrent and fios</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><b>blue_trooper</b></A> : I've seen some talk on these boards that the ActionTec router has some performance issues with large numbers (e.g. 100) of simultaneous connections.  This isn't  Verizon regulating things but could be an issue if you are seeding a large number of popular torrents.  The solution appears to be using an alternative router.<br><br>YMMV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891225</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:25:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: bit torrent and fios</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891117</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1465816"><b>BryanOnRR</b></A> : nope<br>only on dsl would have a limit]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18891117</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:12:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: bit torrent and fios</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18890797</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1429543"><b>noping</b></A> : If they are, I haven't seen the ill effects here. No traffic shaping, no capping (unlike some other ISPs).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18890797</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:26:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>bit torrent and fios</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18890342</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/661360"><b>andranic</b></A> : I have been hearing that verizon is regulating people and bit torrent is there any truth to that?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18890342</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:24:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
