republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Answer Guy

join:2006-07-28
Grass Lake, MI
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

reply to fiberguy

Re: I see no problem here

said by fiberguy:

When they remove a customer from copper for unregulated fiber, you are removing protections from a consumer.
The customer is not forced to switch to FIOS. But even with that fact, what protections does the customer really lose? I just don't see how they are losing something. Yes, there are differences in the products, but the customer does gain a lot when they switch, speed, reliability, and additional services to name a few.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Answer Guy, you failed to help out here.

What I'm getting at is when people switch to Fiber, they are denied return to copper. It doesn't matter if the current home owner or the previous one did, just that someone did.
However, I'd beg to differ on Fios being more reliable.. in fact, it's not. For network? Sure.. maybe.. but as for telephone? No! So long as the service relies on house power and battery back up, the service is still not more reliable than copper.

But I digress as that's not my point - never was.. my POINT, that you quoted was that Fios is a non-regulated service. Since Verizon IS the regulated carrier, when they remove a customer/home from copper for fiber, that house is no longer under protection of a 'regulated telecommunications provider' since fiber is to do as they please.

My point is that Verizon wants to have their cake and eat it too. If they want to get into the unregulated fiber business, then they should sell off the copper plant and go all fiber. However, they, as always, get to skurt consumer protections.

So you have, say, a fiber cut over home, you have the choice of Comcast and Verizon FiOS (for example) for phone providers , who are you going to run to when you need regulatory help? Fios nor comcast phone service (or simply cable phone) is not regulated. SOL bud.

THAT is my point. But, people would sell out themselves because it's golden fiber.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..."


Tuesday, 29-May 04:04:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics