usenet in AT&T U-verse http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18914325 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:52:01 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:52:01 EDT Re: usenet http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918044 anon : I guess if the question should be why with a 3x times faster connection why would powerboost matter. Power boost must really work well.

I am now officially reconsidering going back to my old cable.
It seem like I am finding a new limitation of uverse once a week. :( ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918044 Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:48:39 EDT Re: usenet http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18915807 dot_null :
said by Indy Usr :

I have uverse.

File size - big.

Powerboost, thought that was for internet only.
Powerboost works for NNTP (Usenet) traffic as well.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18915807 Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:51:57 EDT Re: usenet http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18915243 anon : I have uverse.

File size - big.

Powerboost, thought that was for internet only.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18915243 Mon, 20 Aug 2007 21:20:39 EDT Re: usenet http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18914944 AlphaOne : Do you have uverse or regular DSL?

Anyway, my guess is you're seeing comcast's burst rate (powerboost).
How big are the files you're dl'ing at usenet?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18914944 Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:36:17 EDT usenet http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18914325 anon : I switched from comcast hi speed, 1500Kpbs, to uverse 6000Kpbs. Now my usenet provider (same one I had with old cable) downloads at half the speed, now ~600000B/s vs ~1010000B/s with cable. Is something wrong or is uverse just slower?

BTW my test speed at speedtest.dslreports.com is 5650Kpbs and please excuse B/s vs Kpbs.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18914325 Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:05:01 EDT