<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>windows updates takes the blame? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18918035</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:49:36 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:49:36 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: windows updates takes the blame?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918270</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/610636"><b>decadent</b></A> : It is still mostly a free service or very cheap service. I don't understand why anybody expects 5 nines from them. I cannot imagine then what will happen if google goes down for 2 days. There will be probably class actions with 100 millions plaintiffs :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918270</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: windows updates takes the blame?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918117</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by ripcurl :</SMALL><br><br>when all else fails, blame microsoft?<br> </DIV>Actually they don't blame Microsoft but give them praise instead.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://heartbeat.skype.com/2007/08/the_microsoft_connection_explained.html" >heartbeat.skype.com/2007/08/the_&middot;&middot;&middot;ned.html</A><br><div class="bquote">1. Are we blaming Microsoft for what happened?<br><br>We don&#146;t blame anyone but ourselves. The Microsoft Update patches were merely a catalyst &#151; a trigger &#151; for a series of events that led to the disruption of Skype, not the root cause of it. And Microsoft has been very helpful and supportive throughout.<br><br>The Microsoft team was fantastic to work with, and after going through the potential causes, it appeared clearer than ever to us that our software&#146;s P2P network management algorithm was not tuned to take into account a combination of high load and supernode rebooting.</DIV><br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb">Internet News</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918117</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:00:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>windows updates takes the blame?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918035</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : when all else fails, blame microsoft?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18918035</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:47:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
