site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
585
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online

FCC to the rescue?

Since the FCC ordered at the beginning of August that cell phone carriers allow roaming on each others networks "on a just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis" that might solve some of their problems. In my case, AT&T's coverage is actually better than the coverage T-Mobile provides me due to their support of 850MHz. 850MHz covers many places in my commute where T-Mobile's 1900MHz does not. OTOH, there are many places where T-Mobile has superior service to AT&T.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.

whocares0
Premium
join:2003-07-26
..

regardless if they are called Cingular or ATT never had any problems making a call with my cell.



batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL

reply to n2jtx

said by n2jtx:

Since the FCC ordered at the beginning of August that cell phone carriers allow roaming on each others networks "on a just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis" that might solve some of their problems. In my case, AT&T's coverage is actually better than the coverage T-Mobile provides me due to their support of 850MHz. 850MHz covers many places in my commute where T-Mobile's 1900MHz does not. OTOH, there are many places where T-Mobile has superior service to AT&T.
You can roam but open your wallet.
quote:
However, the Commission's decision to leave it up to the marketplace to set roaming prices might eventually have an impact on consumers' wallets.
»www.bpm-today.com/story.xhtml?st···029F6EET


PolarBear03
The bear formerly known as aaron8301
Premium
join:2005-01-03

reply to n2jtx

said by n2jtx:

Since the FCC ordered at the beginning of August that cell phone carriers allow roaming on each others networks "on a just, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory basis" that might solve some of their problems.
Does this mean that in areas where T-Mo used to NOT have roaming agreements with AT&T, that I will now be able to roam on AT&T? Like I said above, there are many areas around here that are served by AT&T but NOT T-Mo, and I cannot roam on them (rendering my phone useless for anything other than 911).

Or does this just mean that where roaming agreements already exist, that it will be for a decent price, rather that a wallet raping?
--
A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any other invention, with the possible exceptions of handguns and Tequilla. -- Mitch Ratcliffe


batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL

said by PolarBear03:



Or does this just mean that where roaming agreements already exist, that it will be for a decent price, rather that a wallet raping?
I quote again, *the marketplace to set roaming prices*. You can now roam on at&t for 60 cents a minute. You can't expect T-Mobile and at&t just to swap roaming as at&t has five times the coverage.


Thebigman

@qwest.net

reply to PolarBear03
Qwest uses the Sprint network for their wireless service, but all of the Qwest plans include free nationwide automatic roaming. Digital or analog. My wife and I share 750 minutes for about $60 a month after bundling with their phone and dsl, but never having to pay roaming fees has been a God send with all the travelling we've been doing. The coverage map for Qwest service once you figure in the roaming agreements is the best out there from what I can tell.

»www.qwest.com/residential/produc···dex.html


Tuesday, 29-May 05:49:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics