So What
@nextweb.net | reply to Nuts
Re: People CHOOSE not to have it
I already posted this. |
|
Nuts
join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH | reply to nasadude
Thats the biggest problem. It doesn't seem to make any sense on how those providing service decide who to serve and who not to serve. |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
 ·Comcast
| reply to Karl Bode
I live in the metro DC area in Maryland, about 6-7 miles outside the beltway. The area I am in was rural 25 years ago, but it's been pretty dense for at least the last ten years and gets denser every year. It's also a wealthy area.
I have been able to get pots since that time, but have never been able to get DSL and never expect to get DSL - I will get FIOS eventually.
For some reason, the incumbent telco has never seen fit to upgrade equipment in this area to offer DSL.
So no service is not always because an area is rural or because everybody living there is "poor"; it's apparent the telcos have various reasons for not serving an area, but one thing is obvious - because they are/were a monopoly, if they don't want to do something, they don't have to. |
|
Nuts
join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH | reply to So What
Where do you get the VAST MAJORITY from. |
|
So What
@nextweb.net
| reply to Karl Bode
The number of states is irrelevant. We're talking about total US households. It may be the case for a few households in Montana compared hundreds of thousands of households in urban centers.
We're not talking about deployment per sq mi, but what % of US HOUSEHOLDS can get broadband and more importantly how many even want it.
All of the data indicates that the VAST majority of total US households can already get broadband services, but barely 1/2 bother to buy it. |
|
TScheisskopf
World News Trust
join:2005-02-13
Belvidere, NJ | reply to So What
Who pays for that study? The question is germane when attempting to understand the quality of its findings. |
|
tivoboy
join:2004-05-10
Menlo Park, CA
| reply to Karl Bode
The unfortunate bit here, which is often referenced in other BB penetration posts involving the USA. USA has a lot of poor and uneducated. Many western european countries, scandinavia and some asian are far better off and this is a bit of the driver for beter pentration rates. :-( |
|
Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02 | reply to So What
quote:
To clarify, according to some sources, 80% of people who can get local phone service qualify for DSL
It's not even remotely close to that percentage in a significant number of states.... |
|
So What
@nextweb.net
| reply to BF69
To clarify, according to some sources, 80% of people who can get local phone service qualify for DSL and I'm operating under the assumption that there is near 100% penetration of local POTS service.
»arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20···874.html
93% of cable ready households can get cable modems.
Between the two is where I get the approximation that better than 8 in 10 US households can get some wired broadband connection. The 96% availability by zip code touted by the FCC doesn't hold much water with me.
So it comes down to yes, there is a tiny minority who can't get broadband but what the numbers clearly show is even when people can get it, they simply don't want it. |
|
