republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » U.S. Improves Broadband Penetration Rankings » People CHOOSE not to have it
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
LOL at report »
« Beware, YMMV!  
AuthorAll Replies


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to So What
Re: People CHOOSE not to have it

quote:
To clarify, according to some sources, 80% of people who can get local phone service qualify for DSL
It's not even remotely close to that percentage in a significant number of states....

tivoboy

join:2004-05-10
Menlo Park, CA

The unfortunate bit here, which is often referenced in other BB penetration posts involving the USA. USA has a lot of poor and uneducated. Many western european countries, scandinavia and some asian are far better off and this is a bit of the driver for beter pentration rates. :-(


So What

@nextweb.net

reply to Karl Bode
The number of states is irrelevant. We're talking about total US households. It may be the case for a few households in Montana compared hundreds of thousands of households in urban centers.

We're not talking about deployment per sq mi, but what % of US HOUSEHOLDS can get broadband and more importantly how many even want it.

All of the data indicates that the VAST majority of total US households can already get broadband services, but barely 1/2 bother to buy it.

Nuts

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH
Where do you get the VAST MAJORITY from.

nasadude

join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast

reply to Karl Bode
I live in the metro DC area in Maryland, about 6-7 miles outside the beltway. The area I am in was rural 25 years ago, but it's been pretty dense for at least the last ten years and gets denser every year. It's also a wealthy area.

I have been able to get pots since that time, but have never been able to get DSL and never expect to get DSL - I will get FIOS eventually.

For some reason, the incumbent telco has never seen fit to upgrade equipment in this area to offer DSL.

So no service is not always because an area is rural or because everybody living there is "poor"; it's apparent the telcos have various reasons for not serving an area, but one thing is obvious - because they are/were a monopoly, if they don't want to do something, they don't have to.

Nuts

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH
Thats the biggest problem. It doesn't seem to make any sense on how those providing service decide who to serve and who not to serve.


So What

@nextweb.net
reply to Nuts
I already posted this.
Forums » U.S. Improves Broadband Penetration RankingsLOL at report »
« Beware, YMMV!  


Sunday, 08-Nov 17:04:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [92] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [82] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [76] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· NO ONE knows what's wrong with my line! [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Please Help, I think my computer is being monitored [Security]
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]