 ROCINANTEOriginal Member 007Premium
join:1999-06-29
Hartsdale, NY | reply to AmeritecTech
Re: The owner of the "Unsecured" WiFi should be arrested ..and here is another one. The terrorist activity itself is obviously the point of contention. Is there actually a law that states that if someone grabs your signal to conduct terrorist activities, then you are partially liable? How does ignorance of the law apply here? If there isn't a law, then this would be a civil case. Perhaps in the court of public opinion someone would be considered liable, but where is the intent? What would "reasonable" people do? Is there negligence involved? What is the cause and effect? Do reasonable people purchase routers to allow others to conduct illegal activities? Of course not, and it does not matter if they are secured or not.
--
CRUNCH THIS! |
