Topic 'more 10 Meg rumors' in forum 'CenturyLink' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/more-10-Meg-rumors-18928844 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:52 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:45:52 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19213496 said by robertfl:

BTW, Fox, nice to see another Ron Paul supporter. I hope he wins.

-RobIt's also nice to meet a fellow Ron Paul supporter; I, too, hope he wins. :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19213496 Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:22:35 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19210799 But until we can get 5.0 service or the 10.0 service..

(Not only that, they peer from atlanta to orlando... or has that changed?)

BTW, Fox, nice to see another Ron Paul supporter. I hope he wins.

-Rob]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19210799 Sun, 07 Oct 2007 04:19:12 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19115193 said by Icon:

said by MrMoody:

said by orph4824:

I wanna see them get rid of copper and go fiber to the pole(FTTP) then have copper drops from there, would all but eliminate noise and distance limits
There are no poles here. :(
;)
Then fiber to the ped. :)
and neither pole nor ped. here ;)

For me it would be more "fiber to the premise".

Ahh, thanks again, orph. So, I take it with FTTP (pole/ped./premise) and copper from there, into your home, it would be similar to ISDN and FiOS's voice quality?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19115193 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:52:45 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19114079 said by MrMoody:

said by orph4824:

I wanna see them get rid of copper and go fiber to the pole(FTTP) then have copper drops from there, would all but eliminate noise and distance limits
There are no poles here. :(
;)
Then fiber to the ped. :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19114079 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:21:18 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113933 said by orph4824:

I wanna see them get rid of copper and go fiber to the pole(FTTP) then have copper drops from there, would all but eliminate noise and distance limits There are no poles here. :(
;)
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113933 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:53:20 EDT My theory on qualifications http://www.dslreports.com/forum/My-theory-on-qualifications-19113817
DSL standard: ADSL2PLUS (ADSL_G.dmt will not support it)
attenuation downstream: 33 db MAX for full 10Mb (which corresponds to ~6900 ft of clean line)
noise margin upstream: about 12 db MIN at 5Mb
noise margin downstream: about 19 db MIN at 5Mb

If you're right at the noise limit it may not (probably won't) be stable. More attenuation will cause it to sync at a lower rate, but should still work up to a point. 38 dB (~7850 ft) should yield 8 Mb net, above that they probably won't give it to you. This jibes with the tech saying 8000 ft.

Note this is basically educated guessing, time will tell. Seeing before/after noise numbers would allow a lot better minimum noise estimate. If anyone meets all of the above but can't get 10Mb (or it won't run stably), speak up.
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/My-theory-on-qualifications-19113817 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:36:48 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113175 For ISDN the POTS side is of course analog after it leaves the modem its all digital 64kb to the CO. FIOS is the same your phones are analog to the FIOS equipment then from there all digital. You wouldn't be able to tell the diffrence from ISDN to FIOS. I had ISDN back when it was the only "broadband" available and the thing I enjoyed the most was the call quality crystal clear unless the other end had noise, you call most businesses or 800 numbers and it was CD quality clean.
--
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113175 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:50:51 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113090 said by orph4824:

I wanna see them get rid of copper and go fiber to the pole(FTTP) then have copper drops from there, would all but eliminate noise and distance limits not to mention a substantial maintaince reduction, coppy degrades over time and has to be patched/replaced, all they have to maintain would be the copper from the pole to your home.
why not just go with FTTH then? Would it really be that much more expensive?

Also, with Verizon's FiOS service your phone travels over copper (in your home) until it reaches the little box on the side of your house, correct? Would you happen to know if the voice quality of phone service is the same as POTS (relatively, that is, if it's *slighly* better, no biggie) or is it more on par with ISDN in terms of voice quality?

Still, I'd take FTTP too....it'd mean insanely fast speeds.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113090 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:36:44 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113070 --
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19113070 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:33:49 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112919 said by DarnellP:

said by Fox McCloud:

Say, what's your ping to www.google.com ?
Sorry for the delay, Fox.

Ping has started ...

PING google.navigation.opendns.com (208.67.219.230): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=25.399 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=26.249 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=25.574 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=23.697 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=25.355 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=23.217 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=23.221 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=23.637 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=25.746 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=23.572 ms

--- google.navigation.opendns.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 23.217/24.567/26.249/1.131 ms
No problem, I just thought you didn't see my request....thanks for the results! That's really good latency.

also, Orph, I tend to agree with you...I just can't see Embarq supporting 10 meg out to 8000 feet...unless the lines are exceptionally good, or they install a repeater midway.

I'm just thankful that I'm slightly under 4,500' from a fiber fed RT....*crosses his finger* let's just hope they deploy a DSLAM next year. (I'm fairly certain my line is clean as I could routinely connect at 50.3k with my v.92 dial-up modem).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112919 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:09:13 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112357 said by DarnellP:

The tech that came out yesterday claimed that my distance was ~2000' and that Embarq would be offering 10 Meg out to ~8000'.
I hope for some this is true but I feel that ~5000-6000 excludeing line issues will be the stable max. Time will tell.
--
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112357 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:42:07 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112298 said by MrMoody:

Thanks. I'd like know what Darnell's numbers were before the change, and his actual CO distance.

I wish that I could accurately tell you, MrMoody. Earlier this year during an online tech support session, a rep said that my distance was ~4000'. The tech that came out yesterday claimed that my distance was ~2000' and that Embarq would be offering 10 Meg out to ~8000'. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112298 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:33:42 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112276 said by Fox McCloud:

Say, what's your ping to www.google.com ?
Sorry for the delay, Fox.

Ping has started ...

PING google.navigation.opendns.com (208.67.219.230): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=25.399 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=26.249 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=25.574 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=23.697 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=25.355 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=23.217 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=23.221 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=23.637 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=25.746 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.219.230: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=23.572 ms

--- google.navigation.opendns.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 23.217/24.567/26.249/1.131 ms]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19112276 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:29:38 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19110776
That's just my luck I'm just barely too far.
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19110776 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 07:30:47 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19110200 --
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19110200 Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:49:28 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19109880 said by orph4824:

Nope your numbers won't support 10m if you tried your upstream (you to the CO/RT) it would never hear you rough cut 13/2=6.5 noisemargin just .5 above failure, you might get sync but you could never reliably maintain it. Going by Darrnells stats I'd say hes about 4200 ft from his CO/RT.
OK, explain this. Why cut in half? The upstream band is the same size for both services. Does the 10Mb downstream signal using higher frequencies increase the upstream noise at the low upstream frequencies? And if so I would think it would be by a constant number of dBs. It was running at 10dB before I put in a whole house splitter and CAT5e. The house wiring was straight 4 conductor, no twist at all.

I believe you, but I like to know how this works. From what you're saying the cutoff will be about 4500 ft of clean line.
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19109880 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:44:10 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19108122 said by MrMoody:

I'm at 4950 ft and my noise numbers are better than Darnell's, but I bet I still won't be able to get it.

EMBARQ> wan adsl linedata near

noise margin downstream: 28 db
output power upstream: 12 db
attenuation downstream: 24 db
carrier load: number of bits per symbol(tone)
tone 0- 31: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 32- 63: 00 00 00 00 00 12 22 34 45 56 66 77 77 77 88 88
tone 64- 95: 78 88 88 88 88 88 87 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
tone 96-127: 77 77 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 55 55 55 55 55
tone 128-159: 54 44 44 44 44 45 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
tone 160-191: 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 50 55 55 25 55
tone 192-223: 55 55 55 55 54 44 44 44 44 43 33 33 22 22 22 22
tone 224-255: 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 20 22 22 20 00 02
tone 256-287: 03 34 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 55 45 55 55 55 55 54
tone 288-319: 44 44 44 22 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 40 43
tone 320-351: 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 04 44 44 44 44
tone 352-383: 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33
tone 384-415: 33 33 33 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
tone 416-447: 22 22 22 22 20 22 22 22 22 22 02 22 22 22 22 22
tone 448-479: 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 11 11 11
tone 480-511: 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

EMBARQ> wan adsl linedata far

noise margin upstream: 13 db
output power downstream: 20 db
attenuation upstream: 8 db
carrier load: number of bits per symbol(tone)
tone 0- 31: 00 00 00 06 78 99 aa bb bb bb bb cb bb ba a8 76
tone 32- 63: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 64- 95: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 96-127: 00 00 00 00 00 70 88 50 6f 5d 31 fd 1f 20 da eb
tone 128-159: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 160-191: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 192-223: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 224-255: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 256-287: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 288-319: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 320-351: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 352-383: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 384-415: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 416-447: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 448-479: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 480-511: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Nope your numbers won't support 10m if you tried your upstream (you to the CO/RT) it would never hear you rough cut 13/2=6.5 noisemargin just .5 above failure, you might get sync but you could never reliably maintain it. Going by Darrnells stats I'd say hes about 4200 ft from his CO/RT.
--
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19108122 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 19:41:12 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107843
EMBARQ> wan adsl linedata near

noise margin downstream: 28 db
output power upstream: 12 db
attenuation downstream: 24 db
carrier load: number of bits per symbol(tone)
tone 0- 31: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 32- 63: 00 00 00 00 00 12 22 34 45 56 66 77 77 77 88 88
tone 64- 95: 78 88 88 88 88 88 87 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77 77
tone 96-127: 77 77 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 55 55 55 55 55
tone 128-159: 54 44 44 44 44 45 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
tone 160-191: 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 50 55 55 25 55
tone 192-223: 55 55 55 55 54 44 44 44 44 43 33 33 22 22 22 22
tone 224-255: 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 20 22 22 20 00 02
tone 256-287: 03 34 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 55 45 55 55 55 55 54
tone 288-319: 44 44 44 22 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 40 43
tone 320-351: 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 04 44 44 44 44
tone 352-383: 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33
tone 384-415: 33 33 33 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22
tone 416-447: 22 22 22 22 20 22 22 22 22 22 02 22 22 22 22 22
tone 448-479: 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 11 11 11
tone 480-511: 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

EMBARQ> wan adsl linedata far

noise margin upstream: 13 db
output power downstream: 20 db
attenuation upstream: 8 db
carrier load: number of bits per symbol(tone)
tone 0- 31: 00 00 00 06 78 99 aa bb bb bb bb cb bb ba a8 76
tone 32- 63: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 64- 95: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 96-127: 00 00 00 00 00 70 88 50 6f 5d 31 fd 1f 20 da eb
tone 128-159: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 160-191: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 192-223: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 224-255: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 256-287: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 288-319: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 320-351: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 352-383: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 384-415: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 416-447: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 448-479: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
tone 480-511: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107843 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:48:25 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107700
ie 5mb equals a sync of 5888, thusly 13,594 is roughly 11,800 theroretical max so my 85% is based on that number not the 13,594 and after his initial tweaks... hes doing fine *insert jealous chagrins* :D

And according to his speed test ping results 14 on one and 41 on the other hes on fastpath, interleave give higher ping results but are steadier and more predicable unlike fasthpath will reach lower but *can* fluctuate greatly esp given the higher you go in speed increaseing entropy.
--
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107700 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:20:52 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107608
Say, what's your ping to www.google.com ?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107608 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:03:40 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107255 said by Fox McCloud:

with that kind of sync rate, I would think that you could (if the backhaul can provide it) have a consistent 10 meg down and 900k up connection...maybe it's the time of day, or you need to tweak it some more? *Shrug*. What's your latency like? Either way, I can't wait to see results like that at my home (if ever).
Haven't had much time, but I tweaked the tcp settings a little:

Didn't do anything for the upload. I'll be experimenting more in the next few days and at different times of the day.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107255 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:05:43 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107192 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107192 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:54:10 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107001 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19107001 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:25:42 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106927 said by DarnellP:

Oh it's the same way. Duh! :D


with that kind of sync rate, I would think that you could (if the backhaul can provide it) have a consistent 10 meg down and 900k up connection...maybe it's the time of day, or you need to tweak it some more? *Shrug*. What's your latency like? Either way, I can't wait to see results like that at my home (if ever).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106927 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:14:24 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106819 said by dave3720:

I got the results of the escalation and all they would tell me is I don't qualify, wouldn't say why or give me any information, other than I couldn't get 10 meg. :(
FWIW, the tech that came to my house today claimed that Embarq is working to deploy more remotes throughout the valley so that the 10 Meg can be offered to a lot more of the user base here in Vegas. I know that doesn't help now, but hopefully you'll be able to get it in the near future.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106819 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 16:01:22 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106750 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106750 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:49:29 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106701 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106701 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:42:30 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106612
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106612 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:28:00 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106449 menu, 24, 8
wan adsl chandata
wan adsl linedata far
wan adsl linedata near

cut and paste :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106449 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:06:32 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106300 said by orph4824:

*Smacks forehead* no not a v8 momment :D nice speed if you would mind post your line stats for that speed just curious and do you know how far you are from your CO/RT?
The tech replaced my old modem with a new 660R modem. How would I go about getting the info you want with this one?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106300 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:46:31 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106287 said by Fox McCloud:

That's really nice speed; wish I could get that. Consider doing a test at www.speedtest.net ?
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106287 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:44:36 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106226 --
Life's 3 rules: 1. Stuff happens 2. Stuff happens on a regular basis 3. Better get used to the first two... (not the actual saying but you get the drift)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106226 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:37:59 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106210 said by robertfl:

They should offer it at a lower rate. Cable still has the better deal compared to them

and yes, I've been using different DNS servers

It's still amazing how Embarq is surviving out here in FWB.

I wish this area would get bought out by Verizon (or VZ would buy out Embarq) so that more of us can get FIOS.

-Rob
Not a good thing; the fastest service they currently offer is 3 meg down...and they show no indication of wanting to go over this. Yeah, 3 meg for $30 is not a bad deal...but it's only 3 meg. Not to mention, Verizon seems to be ignoring their copper, for the most part, in favor of deploying fiber to the BIG cities. Yes, Embarq has some issues, and they need to upgrade their backhaul to support their customers, but at least they plan on having 100% coverage by the end of 2009, and at least they offer higher speeds than Verizon....the only 2 things they need to really work on is their backhaul and offering naked DSL....I suspect the former will come first, but only time will tell.

said by DarnellP:

Before doing any tweaking yet:


That's really nice speed; wish I could get that. Consider doing a test at www.speedtest.net ?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19106210 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:36:32 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19105963
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19105963 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:00:43 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19103455
and yes, I've been using different DNS servers

It's still amazing how Embarq is surviving out here in FWB.

I wish this area would get bought out by Verizon (or VZ would buy out Embarq) so that more of us can get FIOS.

-Rob]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19103455 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 03:51:51 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19102950 said by Gandalf4503:

I don't have an MEDR of 8410, so I think it would be a waste of time for me to even call. It never hurts to ask ...
--
"It is a future in which globalization really does work ... and everybody winds up getting to be part of the third world." - William Gibson]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19102950 Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:44:15 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19097031 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19097031 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:19:02 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19096858 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19096858 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:43:09 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095797 said by Karl Bode:

So can anyone confirm the 10Mbps launched in Vegas today?
yes, I don't know how many customers can get it, but the product did launch today (well yesterday sept 17th)
--
If it is not recorded, it simply does not exist.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095797 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:37:39 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095728 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095728 Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:19:17 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095280 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095280 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:38:52 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095271 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19095271 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 23:36:34 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19093296 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19093296 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:49:48 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092774 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092774 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:22:54 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092301 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092301 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:13:48 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092026 ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19092026 Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:38:32 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19045674
Someone correct me if I'm wrong because I'm highly interested in the 10mb upgrades (depending on the cost of it). My dsl comes out of a remote that IS fiber fed - do I have a chance of 10mb in the near future?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19045674 Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:29:32 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19039409 said by random_guy:

It's been confirmed. Internal email says it'll be available in Vegas only effective 9/17/07. 10.0/896k. I don't have pricing info, though. Also, you have to have a qualifying MEDR of 8410.
hah in some cases.. the worst part about that.. if your fttc and only on a fidl a. your only gonna get 1.5 at the highest. thanks to the lovely engineers. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-19039409 Sun, 09 Sep 2007 06:07:13 EDT Re: more 10 Meg rumors http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-18998157 said by orph4824:

No experience with VDSL so no clue... Best guess without reguard to standard tiers on ADSL2+ would be 8500-9000 downstream and your upstream could easily do 1000. I believe these numbers would be the most stable at that distance, you may very well get 10m down but I'm playing it safe. :)
Ok, thanks; I guess I'll just have to "wait it out" and see what happens if/when a DSLAM is deployed at my fiber-fed RT.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-more-10-Meg-rumors-18998157 Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:34:02 EDT