<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams in AT&#x26;T U-verse</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18942148</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:05:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:05:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18965091</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1320486"><b>Enlightener</b></A> : Good example.  Back in 1996 I had one of the first cable modems ( BayNetworks ) by Jones Internet Channel.  While the internet gateway sucked ( 4 T1's for 1500 customers ) the LAN was awesome.  I was using WINNT 4.0 back then and you could just browse the cloud.  All kinds of `neighbors` had `public` shares and you could easily get 10MB across the cloud.<br><br>These days the download to the internet has greatly improved, but the upload and the near host speed has drastically decreased.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18965091</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:59:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18964184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/831320"><b>cableguy619</b></A> : lol markyD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18964184</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 04:27:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18963439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><b>MarkyD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Enlightener <A HREF="/useremail/u/1320486"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I suppose we should be grateful that it doesn't suck as much as it used to.  I rememeber in years past fiber served customers were either stuck with 1.5MB service or no service at all since no copper meant no DSL.<br><br>I guess it's an extra hard pill for me to swallow because the house I used to own in Virginia got FiOS about 1 month after I moved to Texas...<br> </DIV>I'm not grateful for crap. it just defies all logic that AT&T would push such pathetic service over FIBER!!! Why go to the expense...nevermind. You know what I'm going to say, and so does everyone else here. ;)<br><br>All I know is this. Linking my in-home lab and my friend's lab via EoIP, even though we both have FTTP via AT&T, is going to just be too slow to be useful. So, I'm bypassing AT&T completely and setting up a wireless link between our houses =)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18963439</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:50:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18962996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1320486"><b>Enlightener</b></A> : I suppose we should be grateful that it doesn't suck as much as it used to.  I rememeber in years past fiber served customers were either stuck with 1.5MB service or no service at all since no copper meant no DSL.<br><br>I guess it's an extra hard pill for me to swallow because the house I used to own in Virginia got FiOS about 1 month after I moved to Texas...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18962996</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:30:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18960729</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><b>MarkyD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  cableguy619 <A HREF="/useremail/u/831320"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>att actuallt does fiber to the home ...but it sucks<br> </DIV>there, fixed it for you ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18960729</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:34:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18958188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1320486"><b>Enlightener</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  cableguy619 <A HREF="/useremail/u/831320"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>att actuallt does fiber to the home as well in selcect area that are all prewired.. so new build :)<br> </DIV>I'm pretty sure MarkyD is aware of that considering that he is has posted numerous times that he ( and I ) are served by FTTP.<br><br>I also am pretty sure that he would disagree with your smiley face emoticon since the FTTP service frankly sucks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18958188</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:19:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18956902</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/831320"><b>cableguy619</b></A> : att actuallt does fiber to the home as well in selcect area that are all prewired.. so new build :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18956902</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:00:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18956897</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/831320"><b>cableguy619</b></A> : they have alreay reported 4qtr 2008 it was supposed be the 4th this yr..they are slacking]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18956897</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 00:59:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18953922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><b>MarkyD</b></A> : I assume the reason why FTTP locations are limited to 1 HD stream is that AT&T wants to make uverse offerings universal no matter what platform it's being provided over, to avoid confusion. I think it's silly and short sighted. What's the point of rolling out FTTP if you're going to push DSL quality service through it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18953922</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:57:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18945815</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357547"><b>cwh</b></A> : So who else has deloyed iptv over vdsl and is supplying more than 1 HDTV stream with ms software?<br><br>Why is ATT FTTP locations still limited to 1 HD stream?<br><br>IT is possible that this is a MS problem, but i doubt we will ever actually know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18945815</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:12:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18945657</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MarkyD <A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  d_l <A HREF="/useremail/u/733611"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Virtually everyone with U-Verse now has the bandwidth at 27 mbps to support two HD streams if you believe the various slides that AT&T has posted at investor presentations. This suggests that the absence of the second HD stream is a Microsoft IPTV programming problem and not a lack of bandwidth.<br> </DIV>doesn't Verizon FiOS use MS IPTV software too? How could this be a software limitation? 27mbps is barely enough to deliver 2 HD streams, 2 SD streams and 6/1 internet...<br></DIV>Verizon got tired of waiting for microsoft and developed a modified version of microsoft IPTV software.<br><br>I seriously doubt that microsoft is responsible for uverse problems. Many other carriers like British, Deutshe and Slovak telecom, Singtel, Swisscom and many other use the same technology including AT&T.<br><br><p><div style='z-index:0; text-align:center;display:block;'><object width='425' height='350'><param name='movie' value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gwvb7v_yckg"><param name=wmode value="transparent"><embed wmode="transparent" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gwvb7v_yckg" type='application/x-shockwave-flash' width='425' height='350' allowscriptaccess='samedomain'></embed></object></div></p><center>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwvb7v_yckg" >www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gwvb7v_yckg</A></center><br><br>The only problems I've seen with microsoft software is with AT&T. Hmmm I wonder why?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18945657</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:43:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942232</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/733611"><b>d_l</b></A> : I don't think Verizon uses MS software. If you believe their slides: &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r18552371-">Re: How much bandwidth is available to a VRAD?</A>, then the implication is that AT&T is covering for a MS dual-HD stream software limitation right now.  Admittedly this is reading between the lines, but often problems are presented this way -- very subtly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942232</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:15:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><b>MarkyD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  d_l <A HREF="/useremail/u/733611"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Virtually everyone with U-Verse now has the bandwidth at 27 mbps to support two HD streams if you believe the various slides that AT&T has posted at investor presentations. This suggests that the absence of the second HD stream is a Microsoft IPTV programming problem and not a lack of bandwidth.<br> </DIV>doesn't Verizon FiOS use MS IPTV software too? How could this be a software limitation? 27mbps is barely enough to deliver 2 HD streams, 2 SD streams and 6/1 internet...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942148</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:59:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942059</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/733611"><b>d_l</b></A> : Virtually everyone with U-Verse now has the bandwidth at 27 mbps to support two HD streams if you believe the various slides that AT&T has posted at investor presentations. This suggests that the absence of the second HD stream is a Microsoft IPTV programming problem and not a lack of bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18942059</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 14:47:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941642</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676206"><b>MarkyD</b></A> : I'd be VERY surprised if it happened by the end of the year]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941642</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:39:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941088</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/163584"><b>Flippant</b></A> : I sure hope it does not stop at 2.  While it would make HD more functional it still would not really cover the needs of my current house (3 HD TVs and wildly different viewing habits).  Oh well it will eventually improve to where I could use it it I do not find a better alternative in the meantime.  Still looking for something better than Comcast and dish though.  It is difficult to get very excited about 2 HD streams.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941088</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:19:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1308792"><b>ninjatutle</b></A> : Not this again. This comes up about 2x a month  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941077</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:17:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>2 HD streams</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941056</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1467597"><b>aztec</b></A> : Just had a U-verse tech support guy tell me that they're working on bandwidth upgrades, and intend to support 2 HD streams by the end of this year.  Interesting, if true.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18941056</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:12:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
