Re: FP with Trojan Hunter?

Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » FP with Trojan Hunter?


Share Topic:	RSS topic:	toggle: flat / full normal / watch	Posting:	Post a:	Post a:

Links: ·Hijack This logs? ·Panda Free Tools ·Vundo Removal

Virtualized rootkits - Part 1 »
« Why does Windows Defender Get such a Bad Rep?

MagnusM
Premium
join:2001-07-07

Re: FP with Trojan Hunter?

Ah... this has to do with support for scanning 64-bit executables that was recently added. The scanner doesn't recognize the machine type flag in the files listed above and throws an error. Of course, that shouldn't be happening so I will fix this ASAP.

If anyone is interested in the technical explanation, the files that give this error are files with machine type IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_IA64, which is the Itanium architecture. This is separate from the x64 (AMD-64) architecture which is just the regular 64-bit format, which is why it was omitted.

Thanks Sammy for reporting this! I will upload a corrected version to the servers in the next 30 minutes.
--
Mischel Internet Security
http://www.misec.net

permalink · 2007-08-25 14:24:29 · Print ·

sammysnake Never Forget 911 Premium join:2002-01-19 Salt Lake City, UT ·Qwest.net ·Comcast Formerly ..	Re: FP with Trojan Hunter? Thank you again Magnus, all is well in snakeland again as shown: Registry scan No suspicious entries found Inifile scan No suspicious entries found Port scan No suspicious open ports found Memory scan No trojans found in memory File scan No trojan files found Sammy
	permalink · 2007-08-25 15:04:58 ·

your comment..

Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security	Virtualized rootkits - Part 1 » « Why does Windows Defender Get such a Bad Rep?


Thursday, 10-Dec 13:23:35	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF