<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Wondering.. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18949534</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:20:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Wondering..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18949808</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : it maybe free but look at the problems they have along with other networks built the same way. Earthlink has a ton of problems with overage and MetroFi does too. They need more APs than what they want to put up and pay for. The bandwidth alone is the killer in a big share of the deal along with the equipment costs. Troops devices are not cheap; and that's what they're using.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18949808</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 19:05:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wondering..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18949534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1458955"><b>S_engineer</b></A> : since this quote was tsken from the link above..."In order to make our service easily accessible to a large number of WiFi-enabled devices, Google WiFi is an open-access wireless network, and our signal is not encrypted", does this mean I can be arrested for using it in a car ( i.e.some of the earlier weeks topics)?<br><br>I guess what I'm saying is that if google can offer free wifi why can't others? I mean afterall, you have to know if it's unsecured, its an open network!<br><SMALL>--<br>Burn  a tire, but make sure you buy that carbon offset!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18949534</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:05:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
