<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Mesa hasn&#x27;t been that great in Longmont in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18980722</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:52:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:52:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Mesa hasn&#x27;t been that great in Longmont</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18980722</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  :(<br><br>We've been with Mesa about the same length of time. Every few months I dither about switching to cable because<br>&#8226; they repeatedly and consistently have email problems. Their email service provider is unpleasant, usually slow to upgrade servers, and often enough things just break for hours or sometimes more;<br>&#8226; connectivity has been an problem from time to time because some of their transmitters are just flat out old. They fix things on an "as needed" basis: IOW, when something breaks; maintenance and upgrades haven't seemed to be priorities;<br>&#8226; they seem to be having more turnover in their phone support people and the support people often don't know the true status of email or connectivity issues;<br>&#8226; they tend to be very slow at putting up status messages on the phone;<br>&#8226; the Web site is nearly useless for status information;<br>&#8226; although we pay for the premier speed, the test results I get consistently show we are not getting the service level we're paying for.<br>When we signed on, the owner seemed pretty engaged in the business. These days, I'm not so sure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18980722</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:12:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
