fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | It won't last long. This is more of a test than anything - I bet you. @Home did this in the past and they went the way of bankruptcy. There is no way to run a network like this with any form of QoS.
When the networks of a few years back pulled this, and they grew, there was no way to get a valid product to the home.
My guess is that this will last a short while before they benchmark what the system can actually handle.
Enjoy it while you can.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-serving, the lazy, and I’m told it’s a woman’s prerogative..." |
|
| dont hate . this will last til the end of times this aint late 90`s . |
|
|
|
| reply to fiberguy
Re: It won't last long. Poor management screwed them not network speeds. |
|
 jaaPremium,MVM
join:2000-06-13
kudos:2
 ·Optimum Online
 ·Vonage
| reply to fiberguy
Re: It won't last long. said by fiberguy:This is more of a test than anything - I bet you. @Home did this in the past and they went the way of bankruptcy. There is no way to run a network like this with any form of QoS. When the networks of a few years back pulled this, and they grew, there was no way to get a valid product to the home. My guess is that this will last a short while before they benchmark what the system can actually handle. Enjoy it while you can. I think it is a great way to manage a network. Why artificially extend the time a user is downloading by imposing a limit on their speed? All that does is waste available bandwidth (the difference between the network capacity and the limit), extending the duration of their usage at the limit - increasing the likelihood that another user will want that bandwidth at the same time.
--
NOTHING justifies terrorism. We don't negotiate with terrorists. Those that support terrorists are terrorists. |
|
