<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: One serious question in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18982971</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:15:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:15:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18996333</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/766258"><b>batterup</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Skippy25 <A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Its a matter of want. Whether the foot print is 10 square miles or 10,000 square miles if they wanted to (had true competition) they would do it. Cost of bandwidth to them is not nearly the monster they make it out to be.<br> </div>Cablevision has a node every 10th pole in FIOS areas. This is very recent. Awhile ago a node was hard to find. This has to be costing Cablevision a few bucks. A CATV node needs power and battery backup to convert from glass to copper. An outage of a few hours will drain the batteries and there is no generator backup. Verizon's nodes are passive, no power required.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18996333</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 09:08:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18988142</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><b>swintec</b></A> : Its not the cost of bandwidth, its the cost of infrastruture to deliver that bandwidth.  If you look at how much fiber OOL has vs the other cable companies, its a huuuge difference.  The reaosn OOL has so much more is because of there small(er) footprint.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://blocknews.net">BlockNews.Net- Quality Usenet Block And Unlimited Accounts</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18988142</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:52:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986243</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><b>Skippy25</b></A> : Its a matter of want. Whether the foot print is 10 square miles or 10,000 square miles if they wanted to (had true competition) they would do it. Cost of bandwidth to them is not nearly the monster they make it out to be.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986243</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:15:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982971</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><b>swintec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  plat2on1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/676491"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  swintec <A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mike <A HREF="/useremail/u/203342"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> How can Cablevision with as small of a footprint as they have be able to throw all this bandwidth out<br> </DIV>Actually, I think this is how they DO offer these speeds.<br> </DIV>so we should break up all the big providers then?  :o<br> </DIV>Well no not at all.  OOL simply has a strategically placed network covering a small FOOTPRINT, compared to other providers.  Its the same way Japan can offer such high speeds, it is a very small area to wire and maintain.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://blocknews.net">BlockNews.Net- Quality Usenet Block And Unlimited Accounts</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982971</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:38:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/676491"><b>plat2on1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  swintec <A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mike <A HREF="/useremail/u/203342"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> How can Cablevision with as small of a footprint as they have be able to throw all this bandwidth out<br> </DIV>Actually, I think this is how they DO offer these speeds.<br> </DIV>so we should break up all the big providers then?  :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 20:33:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><b>swintec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Mike <A HREF="/useremail/u/203342"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> How can Cablevision with as small of a footprint as they have be able to throw all this bandwidth out<br> </DIV>Actually, I think this is how they DO offer these speeds.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://blocknews.net">BlockNews.Net- Quality Usenet Block And Unlimited Accounts</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982539</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:23:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>One serious question</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982092</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/203342"><b>Mike</b></A> : Back when I was on 768k/128k Verizon DSL, OOL had 10mb/1mb service a long time ago.<br><br>8 years have passed I can get 3mb/768k DSL and has a that 30/5 tier.  <br><br>Comcast (now in my area after 10 years!) cable modem sucks in my area.  I think this is because everyone and their mother, again literally, are running from Verizon's poor and expensive service. <br><br> How can Cablevision with as small of a footprint as they have be able to throw all this bandwidth out and not go completely bankrupt?  Is it a management style?  Low overhead?  <br><SMALL>--<br>"If something about the human body disgusts you, complain to the manufacturer" - Lenny Bruce<br>What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18982092</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 18:05:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
