jc100
join:2002-04-10
| reply to dentman42
Re: Porn
You have to declare what it is captain obvious. If its photos, you have to state that. Otherwise, you will received blank negatives. Why do you think if you got through the airport you tell them you have film in your bag? The same goes for mailing a package. You tell them there is film in it, and obviously, they will use other means I am sure. |
|
dentman42
join:2001-10-02
Columbus, OH
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to jc100
said by jc100  :Vp, You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true. Yes, the USPS x-rays their packages. That's why it's possbile to mail order a bunch of photographic film and have it delivered in still usable condition. Duh-uh. |
|
jc100
join:2002-04-10
| reply to vpoko
Vp,
You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true. |
|
vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to jc100
Actually the USPS isn't liable for much, and while I'm not an attorney, I don't believe they are liable for delivering a bomb. I know they are statutorially sheilded from liability for damage/loss to your mail (if they fail to deliver a letter or package, you have no recourse), and I'm guessing (though I don't know) that the statute would protect them against damage to third parties. |
|
jc100
join:2002-04-10
| reply to Kearnstd
Kearn,
I have to disagree with your example. By contrast, you gave a bad example. If USPS delivered a bomb, they would be liable. USPS is responsible for checking their packages to ensure illegal and dangerous contents are not being mailed. The USPS does it and I can't imagine UPS not. Hence, while your point was good, your example is not. |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
| reply to dvd536
i think the illegal part is about the piracy and not the porn.
but reguardless it isnt the job of the ISP to be the parent(in the case of porn) or the police officer(in the case of Piracy). for example as a UPS Employee it isnt my job to insure that nobody is sending drugs and package bombs nore can the company be held liable for a delivered package bomb.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA
1 edit | reply to dvd536
I don't think it said that.
Edit: Oops, nevermind, it does. Geez is right. |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ | Porn is illegal in australia? GEEZ! |
|
