Re: Porn in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r18986088 en Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:02:26 EDT Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:02:26 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18990854 jc100 : You have to declare what it is captain obvious. If its photos, you have to state that. Otherwise, you will received blank negatives. Why do you think if you got through the airport you tell them you have film in your bag? The same goes for mailing a package. You tell them there is film in it, and obviously, they will use other means I am sure.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18990854 Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:12:54 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18989916 dentman42 :
said by jc100 See Profile :

Vp,

You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true.
Yes, the USPS x-rays their packages. That's why it's possbile to mail order a bunch of photographic film and have it delivered in still usable condition. Duh-uh.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18989916 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:12:53 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986868 jc100 : Vp,

You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986868 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:02:32 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986586 vpoko : Actually the USPS isn't liable for much, and while I'm not an attorney, I don't believe they are liable for delivering a bomb. I know they are statutorially sheilded from liability for damage/loss to your mail (if they fail to deliver a letter or package, you have no recourse), and I'm guessing (though I don't know) that the statute would protect them against damage to third parties.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986586 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:14:32 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986493 jc100 : Kearn,

I have to disagree with your example. By contrast, you gave a bad example. If USPS delivered a bomb, they would be liable. USPS is responsible for checking their packages to ensure illegal and dangerous contents are not being mailed. The USPS does it and I can't imagine UPS not. Hence, while your point was good, your example is not. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986493 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:59:54 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986469 Kearnstd : i think the illegal part is about the piracy and not the porn.

but reguardless it isnt the job of the ISP to be the parent(in the case of porn) or the police officer(in the case of Piracy). for example as a UPS Employee it isnt my job to insure that nobody is sending drugs and package bombs nore can the company be held liable for a delivered package bomb.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986469 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:57:06 EDT Re: Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986088 vpoko : I don't think it said that.

Edit: Oops, nevermind, it does. Geez is right.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986088 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:50:28 EDT Porn http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986036 dvd536 : Porn is illegal in australia? GEEZ!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18986036 Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:43:02 EDT