Hangmn
Don't Fight It...It's Inevitable
Premium
join:2000-04-08
Philadelphia, PA
| reply to telcolackey
Re: No.
said by telcolackey  :That is true, but it doesn't answer the business question. which is a real issue. Here is an answer to the business question
Provide a better service and people will use it. This may LOOK like its about BT but it really isn't. Its about setting the market up for a 1 tap source for ALL content.
Imagine going to your local Supermarket and all they sell is their market brand, think they would last long?
--
»davescustompc.com |
|
telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth
join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA | reply to matrix3D
That is true, but it doesn't answer the business question. which is a real issue. |
|
matrix3D
join:2006-09-27
Deep River, CT
| reply to telcolackey
quote:
Why should a 3rd party get to use your bandwidth for free to sell their product or service to another individual?
Uh, because it's P2P and more efficient than serving everybody from a single server perhaps? |
|
telcolackey
The Truth? You can't handle the truth
join:2007-04-06
Death Valley, CA
| reply to amungus
said by amungus :I was also able to upload just fine so that I could share with the other fans, so I let it run all night after I got done downloading, figuring I'd be cool and share with fellow fans... Think through that a little. Why should a 3rd party get to use your bandwidth for free to sell their product or service to another individual? And why shouldn't an ISP have an issue with that? |
|
amungus
Premium
join:2004-11-26
America
clubs:
2 edits | reply to quatrix
wow.
I don't use bit-torrent, but the other day, I had to in order to get a (legally free) video that I wanted to watch.
I was also able to upload just fine so that I could share with the other fans, so I let it run all night after I got done downloading, figuring I'd be cool and share with fellow fans... I did limit the upload to about half of what my total gets, so that I could still use my connection, and not be a "hog" on the upstream.
Guess if I had Comcast, I'd have issues and not know why (unless I knew this site  ).
So, thanks for making a really dumb assumption and starting what's sure to be a barrage of pointless comments aimed at countering your opinion...
I'll start another one - I ought to be able to use my bandwidth for WHATEVER type of packets I choose to. No, I don't "HOG" it all the time either. Why should the delivery mechanism instantly trigger such a negative response amongst people just because some people use it for shady purposes. You might as well say the same exact things about http traffic, ftp traffic, or any other kind of traffic.
Such a limited perspective IMHO. |
|
