Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Australian ISPs Don't Want To Babysit » Porn
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« And who ...  
AuthorAll Replies

jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to dentman42
Re: Porn

You have to declare what it is captain obvious. If its photos, you have to state that. Otherwise, you will received blank negatives. Why do you think if you got through the airport you tell them you have film in your bag? The same goes for mailing a package. You tell them there is film in it, and obviously, they will use other means I am sure.

dentman42

join:2001-10-02
Columbus, OH
·AT&T Midwest

reply to jc100
said by jc100 See Profile :

Vp,

You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true.
Yes, the USPS x-rays their packages. That's why it's possbile to mail order a bunch of photographic film and have it delivered in still usable condition. Duh-uh.

jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to vpoko
Vp,

You are far from correct. First, if I buy insurance on my package and it fails to arrive or is delivered damaged, I am compensated. However, if I fail to buy insurance, then I am out of luck. Yet, that has nothing to do with delivering dangerous ordinances. I guarantee you the USPS has xray machines for its packages, as I am sure every other postal entity. As the phrase goes, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Therefore, playing dumb to what you deliver is also not one. Companies can be held reliable if proper safety measures aren't in place. While I am not a lawyer myself, I promise you this is true.
Forums » Australian ISPs Don't Want To Babysit« And who ...  


Saturday, 05-Dec 14:57:49 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [127] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [99] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [80] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· UPS - What do you people think happened? [General Questions]
· First commercial tool to crack BitLocker arrives (Updated) [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Why do you switch distros? [All Things Unix]