Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Embarq 10Mbps » pathetic
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

reply to fcisler
Re: pathetic

896k isn't an ADSL limitation; they could push around 3 meg up with ADSL2+...they simply chose 896k....for whatever reason; hopefully that'll get bumped up to 1024k when it's launched nationwide.

I live close enough to a RT to easily get 10 (or even 20) meg service, but it doesn't have a DSLAM...so, hopefully, when this package is launched nationwide, they'll already have (or will in the very near future) be deploying a DSLAM at my RT....10meg/900k would be really nice....

wispagod

join:2001-06-28
House Springs, MO
well at least when the only thing around was dial up , it was easy buy a 2400bauf or s 28.8 baud modem gezz i miss the simplicity of the good ol day's


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

said by wispagod See Profile :

well at least when the only thing around was dial up , it was easy buy a 2400bauf or s 28.8 baud modem gezz i miss the simplicity of the good ol day's
I really like the latest and greatest thing, but even then, I know your exact feelings; there's times when things weren't so advanced that choices were a lot simpler.


MrMoody
Carbon Based Lifeform

join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC
·Embarq
·Skype
·magicjack.com

reply to Fox McCloud
Actually this is not strictly true. In order to run 3 Mb up, the equipment must support Annex M, which the current modems do not. A firmware update might do it or it could be that the hardware is not capable of it at all. Then there's the DSLAMs as well. 896k is the approximate net speed you get from the maximum ADSL2+ 1024k connection.


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

said by MrMoody See Profile :

Actually this is not strictly true. In order to run 3 Mb up, the equipment must support Annex M, which the current modems do not. A firmware update might do it or it could be that the hardware is not capable of it at all. Then there's the DSLAMs as well. 896k is the approximate net speed you get from the maximum ADSL2+ 1024k connection.
My mistake.

I would certainly hope Embarq has been putting in ADSL2+M cards into their DSLAM....I can see the modems not being able to handle it, but that would only require a new modem; big deal.

The one silver lining about ADSL2+ and ADSL2+M is that it supports port bonding; therefore, we could theoretically see speeds around 96 meg down and 14 meg up if they wanted to...I highly doubt they'll do this though.


MrMoody
Carbon Based Lifeform

join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC
·Embarq
·Skype
·magicjack.com

I'd pay $89 for 20/2, and have one of the fastest residential connections in this entire FiOS-free state.

But I doubt they'll do it any time soon either for several reasons, among which are: No competition at that level in virtually any of their territory, special customer equipment & pro install required, increased support headaches, increased more difficult maintenance, limited port availability, bandwidth hogs would be even more so ...


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23
·Embarq
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

said by MrMoody See Profile :

I'd pay $89 for 20/2, and have one of the fastest residential connections in this entire FiOS-free state.

But I doubt they'll do it any time soon either for several reasons, among which are: No competition at that level in virtually any of their territory, special customer equipment & pro install required, increased support headaches, increased more difficult maintenance, limited port availability, bandwidth hogs would be even more so ...
not to mention the fact that Embarq is very lacking on backhaul bandwidth.

I personally think what Embarq is attempting to do, as of now, is to light up as many RT's and CO's with DSL as quickly as possible so they can attain 100% coverage some time in late 2008-2009 (I'd think 2009). That way, they don't have to worry about "oh, this area can't get DSL" or "hey! No fair, we're the last town in Embarq territory to get DSL". Then, once that build-out is completely, hopefully they'll address their backhaul issue....if they don't...I don't see how they'll make it...
Forums » Embarq 10Mbps


Sunday, 29-Nov 14:59:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Idiotic neighbour [Canadian Chat]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]